Douglas Williams

48 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers

Douglas Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Computer Science Applications 155
  • Statistics and Probability 82
  • Health 66
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 106
  • Sociology and Political Science 331
Replace Haiyan Bai with:
Haiyan Bai United States
Allison W. McCulloch United States
Mark Brown Ireland
Alexis Gabadinho Switzerland
Henry Braun United States
Laura A. McSweeney United States
Nicolas S. Müller Switzerland
Neil Davidson United States
Marco Antônio Moreira Brazil
Reg Baker United States
Douglas Williams relative to Haiyan Bai United States Haiyan Bai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Haiyan Bai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Williams. The network helps show where Douglas Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Williams Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012240
2 2007154
3 201790
4 200968
5 201133
6
Seven Literacy Strategies That Work.
200229
7 201228
8 201727
9 202123
10 201721
11 195620
12 200719
13 201318
14 200717
15 201211
16 200711
17
A Preliminary Study Exploring the Use of Fictional Narrative in Robotics Activities
201010
18 202210
19 20139
20 20179

About Douglas Williams

Douglas Williams is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Media Technology and Computer Science Applications, having authored 55 papers that have together received 926 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (8 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (6 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (6 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (5 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (155 citations), Statistics and Probability (82 citations), Health (66 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (106 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (331 citations). Douglas Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include J. Michael Brick, Yuxin Ma, Guolin Lai, Mary Jane Ford, Penny J. Gullan, Takumasa Kondo, Ting Yan, John R. Whittier, Nancy Frey and Douglas Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly, British Journal of Educational Technology, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, Educational Technology Research and Development and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact