Dorothea Emig-Agius
About
In The Last Decade
Dorothea Emig-Agius
5 papers receiving 133 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Molecular Biology 77
- Neurology 42
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 21
- Cancer Research 20
- Physiology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Dorothea Emig-Agius
This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothea Emig-Agius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothea Emig-Agius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothea Emig-Agius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dorothea Emig-Agius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothea Emig-Agius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothea Emig-Agius. The network helps show where Dorothea Emig-Agius may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dorothea Emig-Agius
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dorothea Emig-Agius. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dorothea Emig-Agius based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dorothea Emig-Agius. Dorothea Emig-Agius is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 65 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.