Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Critical mass and voice: Board gender diversity and financial reporting quality
2021113 citationsDorota Dobija, Aneta Hryckiewicz et al.European Management Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Dorota Dobija's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorota Dobija with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorota Dobija more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorota Dobija. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorota Dobija. The network helps show where Dorota Dobija may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dorota Dobija
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dorota Dobija.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dorota Dobija based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dorota Dobija. Dorota Dobija is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dobija, Dorota, et al.. (2021). Critical mass and voice: Board gender diversity and financial reporting quality. European Management Journal. 40(1). 29–44.113 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Dobija, Dorota, et al.. (2013). Instytucjonalizacja zasad etycznych jako narzędzie budowania wiarygodności i zaufania publicznego do zawodu biegłego rewidenta. 135–170.1 indexed citations
8.
Dobija, Dorota. (2011). Audyting jako element ładu korporacyjnego. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości. 64(64). 25–37.4 indexed citations
9.
Dobija, Dorota, et al.. (2010). Market Reactions to Investments in Information Technology: Insight from Warsaw Stock Exchange. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
10.
Dobija, Dorota. (2010). Dylematy standaryzacji sprawozdawczości finansowej, wyceny i pomiaru ryzyka. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 57. 5–14.5 indexed citations
11.
Weistroffer, Heinz Roland, Narcyz Roztocki, & Dorota Dobija. (2010). Market Reactions to Investments in Information Technology: Insight from Warsaw Stock Exchange. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 72.4 indexed citations
12.
Dobija, Dorota. (2010). Komitet audytu a nadzór nad biegłym rewidentem. Praktyka polskich spółek giełdowych. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 59(115). 5–23.7 indexed citations
13.
Dobija, Dorota. (2009). Problemy ustalania efektywnościkomitetów audytu – istniejący dorobeki kierunki dalszych badań. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
14.
Dobija, Dorota. (2009). O procesach standaryzacyjnych w rachunkowości. 17. 42–49.
Dobija, Dorota. (2004). Pomiar i sprawozdawczość kapitału intelektualnego w organizacjach działających w "nowej gospodarce". Organization and Management. 61–76.7 indexed citations
18.
Dobija, Dorota. (2004). Can Creativity Be Measured. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
19.
Dobija, Dorota. (2002). Pomiar kapitału ludzkiego i możliwości raportowania wyników. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi. 27–39.5 indexed citations
20.
Dobija, Dorota. (2000). Możliwości pomiaru kapitału intelektualnego organizacji i jego prezentacji w sprawozdaniach finansowych. Zeszyty Naukowe / Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krakowie. 63–80.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.