Diane D. Ashe
-
- Media Influence and Health 5
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 2
- Marketing top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 1
-
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 1
-
- Educational Games and Gamification 1
-
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 1
-
- Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues 1
- Health, Medicine and Society 1
- Co-authors
- Lynn E. McCutcheonJohn MaltbyJames HouranLiza DayRaphael GillettRense LangeMichael A. Thalbourne
- Journals
- Personality and Individual Differences (2 papers)The Journal of Psychology (1 paper)British Journal of Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Diane D. Ashe
9 papers receiving 451 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Literature and Literary Theory 236
- Gender Studies 162
- Marketing 83
- Cultural Studies 72
- Clinical Psychology 106
Countries citing papers authored by Diane D. Ashe
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane D. Ashe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane D. Ashe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane D. Ashe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane D. Ashe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane D. Ashe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane D. Ashe. The network helps show where Diane D. Ashe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Diane D. Ashe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Testing a Psycho-anthropological View of Paranormal Belief and Experience | 2007 | 3 |
| 2 | Are Celebrity-Worshippers More Prone to Narcissism? A Brief Report | 2005 | 36 |
| 3 | 2005 | 85 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 119 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 100 | |
| 6 | Encounter experiences in the context of mental boundaries and bilaterality | 2003 | 3 |
| 7 | 2002 | 86 | |
| 8 | The self-reported psychological well-being of celebrity worshippers. | 2001 | 65 |
| 9 | Can individuals find satisfaction participating in interactive team sports | 1999 | 4 |
About Diane D. Ashe
Diane D. Ashe is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies and Philosophy, having authored 9 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (5 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper), Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (1 paper), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (1 paper) and Health, Medicine and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (236 citations), Gender Studies (162 citations) and Marketing (83 citations). Diane D. Ashe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynn E. McCutcheon, John Maltby, James Houran, Liza Day, Raphael Gillett, Rense Lange and Michael A. Thalbourne. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, The Journal of Psychology, British Journal of Psychology, North American journal of psychology and Journal of sport behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.