Diana M. Grace
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael J. PlatowS. Alexander HaslamMichele J. FlemingKenneth I. MavorKaren J. HutchinsonCraig McGartyPenélope J. OakesBrenda Morrison
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers)Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers)
- Journals
- Child DevelopmentJournal of Experimental Social PsychologyEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Diana M. Grace
24 papers receiving 452 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 232
- Social Psychology 231
- Education 138
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
- Gender Studies 43
Countries citing papers authored by Diana M. Grace
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana M. Grace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana M. Grace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana M. Grace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana M. Grace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana M. Grace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana M. Grace. The network helps show where Diana M. Grace may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana M. Grace
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana M. Grace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana M. Grace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana M. Grace. Diana M. Grace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | SISTEM INFORMASI LETAK GEOGRAFIS PENENTUAN JALUR TERCEPAT RUMAH SAKIT DI KOTA PALU MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA GREEDY BERBASIS WEB | 2 |
| 5 | Prejudice is about Collective Values, not a Biased Psychological System | 8 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 68 | |
| 18 | Should Adopted Children Be Granted Access to the Identity of Their Birth Parents? A Psychological Perspective | 1 |
| 19 | 74 | |
| 20 | 55 |
About Diana M. Grace
Diana M. Grace is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Education and Applied Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (231 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (232 citations). Diana M. Grace has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Platow, S. Alexander Haslam, Michele J. Fleming, Kenneth I. Mavor, Karen J. Hutchinson, Craig McGarty, Penélope J. Oakes, Brenda Morrison, Michelle K. Ryan and Barbara Dávid. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and European Journal of Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.