Diana M. Grace

780 total citations
26 papers, 492 citations indexed

About

Diana M. Grace is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana M. Grace has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 492 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Social Psychology, 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 12 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Diana M. Grace's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers). Diana M. Grace is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers). Diana M. Grace collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Israel. Diana M. Grace's co-authors include Michael J. Platow, S. Alexander Haslam, Michele J. Fleming, Kenneth I. Mavor, Karen J. Hutchinson, Craig McGarty, Penélope J. Oakes, Michelle K. Ryan, Brenda Morrison and Barbara Dávid and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and European Journal of Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Diana M. Grace

24 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana M. Grace Australia 12 232 231 138 49 43 26 492
David Cwir United States 2 161 0.7× 163 0.7× 93 0.7× 75 1.5× 29 0.7× 2 421
Nicholas Sorensen United States 13 212 0.9× 186 0.8× 214 1.6× 49 1.0× 21 0.5× 27 510
Jessica Heppen United States 13 190 0.8× 155 0.7× 231 1.7× 94 1.9× 77 1.8× 32 598
Rachel Ben‐Ari Israel 13 234 1.0× 186 0.8× 93 0.7× 32 0.7× 29 0.7× 34 443
Evelyn R. Carter United States 8 214 0.9× 109 0.5× 91 0.7× 32 0.7× 89 2.1× 11 384
Beate Schuster Germany 7 162 0.7× 274 1.2× 123 0.9× 86 1.8× 23 0.5× 16 517
Constantina Badea France 15 467 2.0× 307 1.3× 50 0.4× 52 1.1× 65 1.5× 45 677
Ruth van Veelen Netherlands 12 272 1.2× 184 0.8× 55 0.4× 55 1.1× 131 3.0× 22 500
Sandrine Redersdorff France 10 273 1.2× 216 0.9× 44 0.3× 72 1.5× 102 2.4× 16 441
Kristin A. Lane United States 8 267 1.2× 153 0.7× 52 0.4× 75 1.5× 104 2.4× 8 478

Countries citing papers authored by Diana M. Grace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana M. Grace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana M. Grace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana M. Grace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana M. Grace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana M. Grace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana M. Grace. The network helps show where Diana M. Grace may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana M. Grace

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana M. Grace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana M. Grace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana M. Grace. Diana M. Grace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Platow, Michael J., Diana M. Grace, Martha Augoustinos, et al.. (2023). Gender-based in-group social influence can lead women to view a hostile sexist attitude as less prejudiced and more true. The Journal of Social Psychology. 164(6). 995–1007. 1 indexed citations
3.
Grace, Diana M., et al.. (2021). SISTEM INFORMASI LETAK GEOGRAFIS PENENTUAN JALUR TERCEPAT RUMAH SAKIT DI KOTA PALU MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA GREEDY BERBASIS WEB. 4(2). 59–76. 2 indexed citations
4.
Platow, Michael J., Dirk Van Rooy, Martha Augoustinos, et al.. (2019). Prejudice is about Collective Values, not a Biased Psychological System. New Zealand journal of psychology. 48(1). 16–22. 8 indexed citations
5.
Fleming, Michele J. & Diana M. Grace. (2016). Agents of aspiration: the (often unintended) benefits to university students working in outreach programmes. Educational Research. 58(3). 300–318. 6 indexed citations
6.
Fleming, Michele J. & Diana M. Grace. (2015). Beyond aspirations: addressing the unique barriers faced by rural Australian students contemplating university. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 41(3). 351–363. 17 indexed citations
7.
Fleming, Michele J. & Diana M. Grace. (2015). Eyes on the future: The impact of a university campus experience day on students from financially disadvantaged backgrounds. Australian Journal of Education. 59(1). 82–96. 10 indexed citations
8.
Grace, Diana M. & Michael J. Platow. (2015). Showing Leadership by Not Showing Your Face. SAGE Open. 5(1). 2 indexed citations
9.
Fleming, Michele J. & Diana M. Grace. (2015). Aspiration, achievement and access: The ACT-Indigenous Success pathway to university. 17(Indigenous Pathways). 74–83. 2 indexed citations
10.
Fleming, Michele J. & Diana M. Grace. (2014). Increasing participation of rural and regional students in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 36(5). 483–495. 39 indexed citations
11.
Fleming, Michele J. & Diana M. Grace. (2014). Widening the lens: Utilizing teacher perspectives to assess widening participation efforts in Australian higher education. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning. 16(2). 46–62. 5 indexed citations
12.
Platow, Michael J., John Hunter, Nyla R. Branscombe, & Diana M. Grace. (2014). Social Creativity in Olympic Medal Counts: Observing the Expression of Ethnocentric Fairness. Social Justice Research. 27(3). 283–304. 5 indexed citations
13.
George, Amanda M., et al.. (2011). Bingo!. Teaching of Psychology. 39(1). 29–33. 6 indexed citations
14.
Platow, Michael J., Diana M. Grace, & Michael Smithson. (2011). Examining the Preconditions for Psychological Group Membership. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3(1). 5–13. 15 indexed citations
15.
Grace, Diana M., Barbara Dávid, & Michelle K. Ryan. (2008). Investigating Preschoolers’ Categorical Thinking About Gender Through Imitation, Attention, and the Use of Self-Categories. Child Development. 79(6). 1928–1941. 29 indexed citations
16.
Platow, Michael J., et al.. (2008). Psychological group memberships as outcomes of resource distributions. European Journal of Social Psychology. 38(5). 836–851. 12 indexed citations
17.
Platow, Michael J., et al.. (2005). Non‐instrumental voice and extra‐role behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology. 36(1). 135–146. 24 indexed citations
18.
Platow, Michael J., et al.. (2004). “It’s not funny if they’re laughing”: Self-categorization, social influence, and responses to canned laughter. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 41(5). 542–550. 68 indexed citations
19.
Nolan, Mark & Diana M. Grace. (2003). Should Adopted Children Be Granted Access to the Identity of Their Birth Parents? A Psychological Perspective. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 12(1). 67–79. 1 indexed citations
20.
McGarty, Craig, S. Alexander Haslam, Karen J. Hutchinson, & Diana M. Grace. (1995). Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology. 34(3). 237–256. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026