Beate Schuster

1.0k citations
16 papers · 517 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Beate Schuster

15 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Beate Schuster
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Social Psychology 274
  • Applied Psychology 41
  • General Decision Sciences 14
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 91
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
Replace Terry Honess with:
Terry Honess United Kingdom
George C. Smith United States
Thomas A. Kolditz United States
Harry Weger United States
Ann P. Ruvolo United States
Denise Driscoll United States
Lorand B. Szalay United States
Anthony D. Hermann United States
Krysia Yardley United Kingdom
Theresa E. DiDonato United States
Beate Schuster relative to Terry Honess United Kingdom Terry Honess's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Terry Honess · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Schuster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Schuster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Schuster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Schuster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Schuster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Schuster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Schuster. The network helps show where Beate Schuster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Beate Schuster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beate Schuster Line = papers co-authored together Beate Schuster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1989280
2 199689
3 199970
4 199829
5 200511
6 20029
7 19987
8 19985
9 20175
10 20054
11 20072
12
Can mothers win? The transformation of mother-daughter relationships in late childhood
19982
13 19951
14 20131
15 19991
16
Die Umgestaltung der Mutter-Kind-Beziehung in der Präadoleszenz
20031

About Beate Schuster

Beate Schuster is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Education and Statistics and Probability, having authored 16 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (2 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (274 citations), Applied Psychology (41 citations), General Decision Sciences (14 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (91 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations). Beate Schuster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Weiner, Diane N. Ruble, Franz Emanuel Weinert, Friedrich Försterling, Udo Rudolph, Hans−Werner Goetz, David Nirenberg, James Youniss, Bernhard Jussen and Philippe Buc. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, European Journal of Developmental Psychology, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and European Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact