Dian Squire
- Education top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- OiYan PoonB. WilliamsFrank TuittCorinne Maekawa KodamaJason C. K. ChanZ NicolazzoSteve D. MobleyJason C. Garvey
- Topics
- Higher Education Research Studies (16 papers)Critical Race Theory in Education (15 papers)Mentoring and Academic Development (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaReview of Educational ResearchHarvard Educational Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Dian Squire
25 papers receiving 454 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Education 299
- Sociology and Political Science 290
- Social Psychology 122
- Gender Studies 65
- Political Science and International Relations 49
Countries citing papers authored by Dian Squire
This map shows the geographic impact of Dian Squire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dian Squire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dian Squire more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dian Squire
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dian Squire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dian Squire. The network helps show where Dian Squire may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dian Squire
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dian Squire. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dian Squire based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dian Squire. Dian Squire is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | Critical Cultural Student Affairs Praxis and Participatory Action Research | 2 |
| 14 | 162 | |
| 15 | Shifting Narratives in Doctoral Admissions: Faculty of Color Understandings of Diversity, Equity, and Justice in a Neoliberal Context | 3 |
| 16 | Going Against the Grain: Battling Market-Based Individualism in Higher Education by Establishing an Open-Access Collectivist Journal | 1 |
| 17 | Engaging Race and Power in Higher Education Organizations Through a Critical Race Institutional Logics Perspective | 6 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 61 |
About Dian Squire
Dian Squire is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Education and Communication, having authored 30 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Research Studies (16 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (15 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (299 citations), Gender Studies (65 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (290 citations). Dian Squire has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include OiYan Poon, B. Williams, Frank Tuitt, Corinne Maekawa Kodama, Jason C. K. Chan, Z Nicolazzo, Steve D. Mobley, Jason C. Garvey, Susan Rankin and Rosemary J. Perez. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Review of Educational Research and Harvard Educational Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.