Review of Educational Research

2.7k papers and 223.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Review of Educational Research in the last decades have received a total of 223.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Educational Research usually cover Education (1.3k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (562 papers) and Social Psychology (270 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (238 papers), School Choice and Performance (205 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Educational Research are Vincent Tinto, John Hattie, Frank Pajares, Helen Timperley, Selcuk R. Sirin, Robert E. Slavin, Valerie J. Shute, Jennifer A. Fredricks, Phyllis C. Blumenfeld and Alison H. Paris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Educational Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Educational Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Educational Research.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Educational Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Educational Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Educational Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Educational Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025