Review of Educational Research

291.5k citations
2.2k papers · · active since 1951

Impact in

  • Education top 0.1%
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
    • Science Education and Pedagogy
    • Student Assessment and Feedback
    • Higher Education Research Studies
    • Reading and Literacy Development
    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Papers in

Review of Educational Research

1.3k papers receiving 196.8k citations

Peers

Review of Educational Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Education 88.1k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 26.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 14.9k
  • Computer Science Applications 4.0k
  • Linguistics and Language 2.3k
Replace American Educational Research Journal with:
American Educational Research Journal United States
Educational Researcher United States
Journal of Educational Psychology United States
Teaching and Teacher Education United States
Contemporary Educational Psychology United States
Learning and Instruction Germany
British Journal of Educational Studies United Kingdom
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education United States
The Journal of Educational Research United States
Journal of Research in Science Teaching United States
Review of Educational Research relative to American Educational Research Journal United States American Educational Research Journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
American Educational Research Journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Review of Educational Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Educational Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Educational Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Educational Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Review of Educational Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Educational Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Educational Research.

About Review of Educational Research

The 2.2k papers published in Review of Educational Research in the last decades have received a total of 291.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Review of Educational Research usually cover Education (548 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (192 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (109 papers), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (70 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (85 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (65 papers), Educational Research and Methods (56 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (55 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (50 papers), School Choice and Performance (44 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (43 papers) and Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Educational Research are John Hattie, Vincent Tinto, Helen S. Timperley, Frank Pajares, Valerie J. Shute, Selcuk R. Sirin, Jennifer A. Fredricks, Robert E. Slavin, Alison H. Paris and Phyllis C. Blumenfeld.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact