Deborah Philips
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
Papers in
-
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development 4
- Co-authors
- Chris WeedonFrancesco PagniniGarry WhannelNeil RavenscroftIan HaywoodMichael James BennettDeborah ShawMichael Foley
- Journals
- Women a Cultural Review (4 papers)International Journal of Cultural Studies (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)The Lancet Psychiatry (1 paper)Tourist Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Deborah Philips
23 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Gender Studies 119
- Literature and Literary Theory 41
- Sociology and Political Science 161
- Museology 12
- Linguistics and Language 15
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Philips
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Philips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Philips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Philips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Philips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Philips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Philips. The network helps show where Deborah Philips may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Philips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 6 | Literary Politics: The Politics of Literature and the Literature of Politics | 2013 | 1 |
| 7 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 11 | Women's Fiction 1945-2005: Writing Romance | 2008 | 1 |
| 12 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 18 | Carnival and control: the commodification of the carnivalesque at Disneyland. | 1998 | 7 |
| 19 | Brave New Causes: Women in British Postwar Fictions | 1997 | 4 |
| 20 | 1996 | 1 |
About Deborah Philips
Deborah Philips is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Gender Studies and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 29 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers) and Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (119 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (41 citations), Sociology and Political Science (161 citations), Museology (12 citations) and Linguistics and Language (15 citations). Deborah Philips has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chris Weedon, Francesco Pagnini, Garry Whannel, Neil Ravenscroft, Ian Haywood, Michael James Bennett, Deborah Shaw and Michael Foley. Their work appears in journals such as Women a Cultural Review, International Journal of Cultural Studies, The Modern Language Review, The Lancet Psychiatry and Tourist Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.