The Lancet Psychiatry

1.3k papers and 85.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in The Lancet Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 85.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Lancet Psychiatry usually cover Clinical Psychology (538 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (366 papers) and Social Psychology (283 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (243 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (204 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Lancet Psychiatry are George F. Koob, Nora D. Volkow, Christine Kuehner, Graham Thornicroft, Paul J. Harrison, Yu‐Tao Xiang, John Geddes, Maxime Taquet, Seena Fazel and Daniel Vigo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Lancet Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Lancet Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Lancet Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in The Lancet Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Lancet Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Lancet Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Lancet Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025