Countries where authors publish in Tourist Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tourist Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tourist Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tourist Studies more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Tourist Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tourist Studies.
About Tourist Studies
The 474 papers published in Tourist Studies in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Tourist Studies usually cover Geography, Planning and Development (144 papers), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (29 papers) and Museology (31 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (282 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (85 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (82 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (79 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (72 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (60 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (43 papers) and Cruise Tourism Development and Management (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tourist Studies are Tim Edensor, Adrian Franklin, Mike Crang, Kjell Olsen, Cara Aitchison, Robert Shepherd, Dean MacCannell, Sally Everett, Jarkko Saarinen and Pau Obrador Pons.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.