Journal of Traumatic Stress
About
In The Last Decade
Journal of Traumatic Stress
3.1k papers receiving 155.2k citations
Fields of papers published in Journal of Traumatic Stress
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Traumatic Stress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Traumatic Stress.
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Traumatic Stress
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Traumatic Stress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Traumatic Stress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Traumatic Stress more than expected).
- The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (1995)
- The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma (1996)
- The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma (1996)
- The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for <i>DSM‐5</i> (PCL‐5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation (2015)
- The development of a clinician‐administered PTSD scale (1995)
- Psychometric analysis and refinement of the connor–davidson resilience scale (CD‐RISC): Validation of a 10‐item measure of resilience (2007)
- Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post‐traumatic stress disorder (1993)
- Vicarious traumatization: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims (1990)
- Moral Injury: An Integrative Review (2019)
- Predictors of PTSD symptom severity and social reactions in sexual assault victims (2001)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.