David Punter
-
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 15
- Moravian Church and William Blake 9
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 5
- Modern American Literature Studies 4
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 4
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 4
- Cultural Studies top 0.5%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 19
- Classics top 10%
-
- Law in Society and Culture 3
David Punter
51 papers receiving 430 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Literature and Literary Theory 399
- Cultural Studies 208
- Geography, Planning and Development 44
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 34
- Classics 25
Countries citing papers authored by David Punter
This map shows the geographic impact of David Punter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Punter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Punter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Punter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Punter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Punter. The network helps show where David Punter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Punter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 4 | A new companion to the gothic | 2012 | 8 |
| 5 | 21st Century Gothic | 2011 | 0 |
| 6 | Interiors: Interiority/Exteriority in Literary and Cultural Discourse | 2010 | 1 |
| 7 | Uncanny Modernity: Cultural Theories, Modern Anxieties | 2008 | 12 |
| 8 | Le Gothic: Influences and Appropriations in Europe and America | 2007 | 1 |
| 9 | Post/modern Dracula | 2007 | 1 |
| 10 | 2002 | 98 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 12 | Spectral Readings: Towards a Gothic Geography | 1999 | 12 |
| 13 | The gothic tradition | 1996 | 1 |
| 14 | The modern gothic | 1996 | 1 |
| 15 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 16 | The romantic unconscious: A study in narcissism and patriarchy | 1989 | 2 |
| 17 | 1987 | 19 | |
| 18 | Introduction to contemporary cultural studies | 1986 | 84 |
| 19 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 3 |
About David Punter
David Punter is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, General Psychology and Classics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (19 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (15 papers), Moravian Church and William Blake (9 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers), Modern American Literature Studies (4 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (399 citations), Cultural Studies (208 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (44 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (34 citations) and Classics (25 citations). David Punter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Anne D. Wallace, Kathryn Hume, John Guillory, Michael Gamer, Jeffrey N. Cox, Misha Kavka, Steven Bruhm, Jerrold E. Hogle and Éric Savoy. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Romanticism, The Modern Language Review, Gothic Studies, English Language Notes and Critical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.