Countries citing papers authored by Ansgar Nünning
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ansgar Nünning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ansgar Nünning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ansgar Nünning more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ansgar Nünning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ansgar Nünning. The network helps show where Ansgar Nünning may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ansgar Nünning
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ansgar Nünning.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ansgar Nünning based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ansgar Nünning. Ansgar Nünning is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nünning, Ansgar, et al.. (2020). Futures of the Study of Culture. Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation).2 indexed citations
2.
Nünning, Ansgar & Vera Nünning. (2020). Krise als medialer Leitbegriff und kulturelles Erzählmuster:: Merkmale und Funktionen von Krisennarrativen als Sinnstiftung uber Zeiterfahrung und als literarische Laboratorien fur alternative Welten. 70(3). 241–278.1 indexed citations
3.
Nünning, Ansgar, et al.. (2015). (Trans-)national criteria, norms and standards in literary studies : a comparative analysis of criteria-based 'ex ante' evaluation forms of funding proposals in the humanities. MADOC (University of Mannheim). 65(1). 115–135.2 indexed citations
4.
Nünning, Ansgar. (2010). Światy – światopoglądy – sposoby tworzenia światów. O wiedzy w literaturze i o zadaniu literaturoznawstwa. Teksty Drugie. 109–125.
5.
Nünning, Ansgar, et al.. (2009). Introduction: Metaphors as a Way of Worldmaking, or: Where Metaphors and Culture Meet. 25.2 indexed citations
6.
Grabes, Herbert, et al.. (2009). Metaphors shaping culture and theory. G. Narr eBooks.2 indexed citations
Nünning, Ansgar, et al.. (2004). Kulturwissenschaftliche Literaturwissenschaft : Disziplinäre Ansätze, Theoretische Positionen, Transdisziplinäre Perspektiven. G. Narr eBooks.3 indexed citations
11.
Nünning, Ansgar. (2004). Where Historiographic Metafiction and Narratology Meet: Towards an Applied Cultural Narratology. Style. 38(3). 352.11 indexed citations
12.
Erll, Astrid, et al.. (2003). Literatur, Erinnerung, Identität : Theoriekonzeptionen und Fallstudien.4 indexed citations
Nünning, Ansgar. (2001). Totgesagte leben länger: Anmerkungen Zur Rückkehr des Autors und zu Wiederbelebungsversuchen des >impliziten Autors<. 353–386.2 indexed citations
Nünning, Vera, et al.. (2000). Multiperspektivisches Erzählen : zur Theorie und Geschichte der Perspektivenstruktur im englischen Roman des 18. bis 20. Jahrhunderts.1 indexed citations
19.
Nünning, Ansgar. (1999). 'Verbal Fictions?' Kritische Uberlegungen und narratologische Alternativen zu Hayden Whites Einebnung des Gegensatzes zwischen Historiographie und Literatur. 351–380.2 indexed citations
20.
Nünning, Ansgar, Sabine Buchholz, & Manfred Jahn. (1998). Literaturwissenschaftliche Theorien, Modelle und Methoden : eine Einführung.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.