David Knott

27 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

David Knott
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Music 16
  • Social Psychology 92
  • Conservation 15
  • Neurology 68
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 23
Replace Tomomi Ueda with:
Tomomi Ueda Japan
Chin Yee Cheong Singapore
Lancer Naghdechi United States
Rauno Mäkelä Finland
V. Monsalve Spain
Michael Daniel United States
Lobsang Marcia United States
Nancy Stephenson United States
Jonathan Dang United States
Andrew Nicolaou United Kingdom
David Knott relative to Tomomi Ueda Japan Tomomi Ueda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Tomomi Ueda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Knott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Knott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Knott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Knott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Knott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Knott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Knott. The network helps show where David Knott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Knott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Knott Line = papers co-authored together David Knott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202054
2 196449
3 199034
4 198128
5 202020
6 196620
7 196919
8 196313
9 196611
10 196711
11 202310
12 202210
13 19998
14 20187
15 19676
16 19746
17 20205
18 20154
19 19864
20
Catalogue of the Goldsmiths Library of Economic Literature
19834

About David Knott

David Knott is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Music and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Therapy and Health (8 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (6 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (6 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (4 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (16 citations), Social Psychology (92 citations), Conservation (15 citations), Neurology (68 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (23 citations). David Knott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James D. Beard, George Barlow, Ted L. Rosenthal, Neil B. Edwards, Renate H. Rosenthal, Sheri L. Robb, James A. Wallace, Michael H. Thaut, Claire Ghetti and Kristin Stegenga. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, Psychiatric Services, Music Therapy Perspectives and BDJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact