Jonathan Dang

9 papers receiving 422 citations

Jonathan Dang's Hit Papers

Pain and Depression: A Systematic Review 2018 · 305 citations
3050+2+5Years since publication100200300

Peers

Jonathan Dang
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Pharmacology 80
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 52
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 10
Replace Lancer Naghdechi with:
Lancer Naghdechi United States
Lobsang Marcia United States
Vanessa Pazdernik United States
Antonella Ciaramella Italy
Martin Lieb Germany
John Hughes United Kingdom
G. Crawford United Kingdom
Dena H. Jaffe United States
Sakshi Prasad Ukraine
Kenneth M. Dürsteler‐MacFarland Switzerland
Jonathan Dang relative to Lancer Naghdechi United States Lancer Naghdechi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Lancer Naghdechi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Dang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Dang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Dang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Dang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Dang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Dang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Dang. The network helps show where Jonathan Dang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Dang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Dang Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Dang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Pain and Depression: A Systematic Review
Hit paper breakdown →
2018305
2 201757
3
The Assessment and Measurement of Wellness in the Clinical Medical Setting: A Systematic Review.
201839
4 20198
5 20167
6
The Impact of Psilocybin on Patients Experiencing Psychiatric Symptoms: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.
20237
7 20215
8 20242
9 20211

About Jonathan Dang

Jonathan Dang is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Management of metastatic bone disease (1 paper), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (1 paper) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (24 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation), Pharmacology (80 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (52 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (10 citations). Jonathan Dang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Waguih William IsHak, Brigitte Vanle, Itai Danovitch, Lobsang Marcia, Lancer Naghdechi, Charles Louy, Raymond Wen, James Mirocha, Margaret Haglund and Matthew Goldenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Harvard Review of Psychiatry, Journal of Addiction Medicine, Clinical ophthalmology and Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact