Psychiatric Services

13.5k papers and 308.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.5k papers published in Psychiatric Services in the last decades have received a total of 308.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychiatric Services usually cover Clinical Psychology (6.0k papers), General Health Professions (3.8k papers) and Social Psychology (3.4k papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (3.1k papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2.3k papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychiatric Services are Robert A. Rosenheck, Jeffrey L. Geller, Stephen Thielke, Robert E. Drake, Leona L. Bachrach, Paul S. Appelbaum, Patrick W. Corrigan, Alan I. Green, H. Richard Lamb and Kirk Heilbrun.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychiatric Services

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychiatric Services. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychiatric Services.

Countries where authors publish in Psychiatric Services

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychiatric Services. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychiatric Services with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychiatric Services more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025