David Hooson

524 citations
36 papers · 309 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

David Hooson

31 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

David Hooson
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Geography, Planning and Development 102
  • Anthropology 39
  • Demography 35
  • Political Science and International Relations 63
  • Sociology and Political Science 108
Replace Mildred Berman with:
Mildred Berman United States
Geoffrey Bolton Australia
George Kish United States
H. C. Darby United Kingdom
W. Gordon East United Kingdom
Edmund W. Gilbert United Kingdom
Charles E. Nowell United States
John Leighly United States
Brian W. Blouet United States
Carville Earle United States
David Hooson relative to Mildred Berman United States Mildred Berman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mildred Berman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Hooson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Hooson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hooson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hooson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Hooson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hooson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hooson. The network helps show where David Hooson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside David Hooson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Hooson Line = papers co-authored together David Hooson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200172
2 196134
3 198430
4 196221
5 197818
6 197116
7 196814
8 197113
9 199812
10 196010
11 19718
12 19628
13 19598
14
The Soviet Union : people and regions
19666
15 19845
16 19724
17 19604
18 20044
19 19643
20 19872

About David Hooson

David Hooson is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Demography, having authored 36 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (9 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (5 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (4 papers), Soviet and Russian History (2 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (2 papers), Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends (2 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (102 citations), Anthropology (39 citations), Demography (35 citations), Political Science and International Relations (63 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (108 citations). David Hooson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Susan Schulten, William H. Parker, J. E. Williams, Ralph S. Clem, Martin W. Lewis, Kären Wigen, Glenn T. Trewartha, Fay Gale, George B. Cressey and Roland J. Fuchs. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, Geographical Review, GeoJournal, The Professional Geographer and Geographical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact