The Professional Geographer

3.3k papers and 56.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in The Professional Geographer in the last decades have received a total of 56.4k indexed citations. Papers published in The Professional Geographer usually cover Sociology and Political Science (796 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (646 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (389 papers) specifically the topics of Geographic Information Systems Studies (331 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (240 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (223 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Professional Geographer are Kim England, Mei‐Po Kwan, Jeffrey R. Crump, Gill Valentine, B. L. Turner, Arch C. Gerlach, Jeremy Mennis, Rüth Wilson Gilmore, John E. Oliver and Cindi Katz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Professional Geographer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Professional Geographer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Professional Geographer.

Countries where authors publish in The Professional Geographer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Professional Geographer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Professional Geographer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Professional Geographer more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025