Edmund W. Gilbert

653 citations
35 papers · 407 indexed · h-index 12

Edmund W. Gilbert

32 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Edmund W. Gilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Geography, Planning and Development 101
  • History and Philosophy of Science 25
  • Anthropology 42
  • Space and Planetary Science 5
  • Urban Studies 23
Replace George Kish with:
George Kish United States
Joseph E. Schwartzberg United States
Mildred Berman United States
David Hooson United States
John Leighly United States
H. C. Darby United Kingdom
David Buisseret United States
Geoffrey Bolton Australia
Robin Butlin United Kingdom
Dorothy Middleton United States
Edmund W. Gilbert relative to George Kish United States George Kish's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
George Kish · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edmund W. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edmund W. Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edmund W. Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edmund W. Gilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edmund W. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edmund W. Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edmund W. Gilbert. The network helps show where Edmund W. Gilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Edmund W. Gilbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edmund W. Gilbert Line = papers co-authored together Edmund W. Gilbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19912
2 197362
3 197251
4 19715
5 19714
6 19715
7
Urbanization and its problems : essays in honour of E.W. Gilbert
19703
8 19701
9 196925
10 19683
11 19676
12 19672
13 19661
14 19641
15 19623
16
The university town in England and West Germany : Marburg, Göttingen, Heidelberg and Tübingen, viewed comparatively with Oxford and Cambridge
19611
17 195862
18 19582
19 19534
20 19520

About Edmund W. Gilbert

Edmund W. Gilbert is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (4 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (4 papers), Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (4 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Canadian Identity and History (2 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (2 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (2 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (101 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (25 citations) and Anthropology (42 citations). Edmund W. Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include Wayne K.D. Davies, Nicholas B. Stephens, Preston E. James, G. R. Crone, E. E. Rich, Chauncy D. Harris, Geoffrey J. Martin, W. Ashworth, Alan R. H. Baker and John Langton. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Geology and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026