J. E. Williams

11 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

J. E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Drug Discovery 3
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 68
  • Paleontology 51
  • Parasitology 45
  • Economics and Econometrics 149
Replace Annie Wilkinson with:
Annie Wilkinson United Kingdom
John Black United Kingdom
David S. Shields United States
Thailand. Samnakngān Sathiti hǣng Chāt
Tashi Tobgay Bhutan
B. Hubert France
Charles M. Good United States
Xiaoxi Zhang China
Vinay R. Kamat Canada
J. E. Williams relative to Annie Wilkinson United Kingdom Annie Wilkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Annie Wilkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Williams. The network helps show where J. E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside J. E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together J. E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2000225
2 1973163
3 1997105
4 197751
5
Cancer screening intervention among black women in inner-city Atlanta--design of a study.
199246
6 196134
7 196311
8 19639
9 19849
10
Sex stereotypes in Portugal and Singapore
19897
11 19714
12 19711
13 19571
14 19761

About J. E. Williams

J. E. Williams is a scholar working on Anthropology, General Health Professions, Oncology, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 14 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Geological formations and processes (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (1 paper) and Soil and Environmental Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Drug Discovery (3 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (68 citations), Paleontology (51 citations), Parasitology (45 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (149 citations). J. E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Charles H. Feinstein, Jonathan M. Liff, Ralph J. Coates, Daniel S. Blumenthal, John F. C. Sung, Ernest Alema‐Mensah, Bernard Owens, David Hooson, R. Neves and Raymond S. Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, British Journal of Sociology, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Pacific Affairs and Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact