William H. Parker
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.1%
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan S. BerekDavid L. OliveElizabeth A. PrittsDonna ShoupeMichael S. BroderCindy FarquharYao FuJoAnn E. Manson
- Topics
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments (33 papers)Endometriosis Research and Treatment (26 papers)Gynecological conditions and treatments (23 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyFertility and Sterility
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
William H. Parker
63 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.9k
- Reproductive Medicine 2.6k
- Surgery 662
- Genetics 457
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 346
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Parker. The network helps show where William H. Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Parker. William H. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 128 | |
| 7 | 85 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 80 | |
| 10 | 305 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | Bilateral oophorectomy: Solving the risk/benefit equation — Choosing candidates, monitoring outcomes | 2 |
| 13 | Ovarian Conservation at the Time of Hysterectomy and Long-Term Health Outcomes in the Nurses’ Health Studybreakdown → | 454 |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 50 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 57 |
About William H. Parker
William H. Parker is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 68 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (33 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (26 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.9k citations), Reproductive Medicine (2.6k citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (346 citations). William H. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan S. Berek, David L. Olive, Elizabeth A. Pritts, Donna Shoupe, Michael S. Broder, Cindy Farquhar, Yao Fu, JoAnn E. Manson, Eunice Chang and Diane Feskanich. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Fertility and Sterility.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.