David Blazar

2.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
34 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

David Blazar is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, David Blazar has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Education, 12 papers in Information Systems and Management and 3 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in David Blazar's work include School Choice and Performance (21 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (13 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (12 papers). David Blazar is often cited by papers focused on School Choice and Performance (21 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (13 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (12 papers). David Blazar collaborates with scholars based in United States, Cyprus and Norway. David Blazar's co-authors include Matthew A. Kraft, Heather C. Hill, Kathleen Lynch, Charalambos Y. Charalambous, Erica Litke, Mark J. Chin, Mary Beisiegel, Thomas J. Kane, Douglas N. Harris and Michal Kurlaender and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Educational Research, American Educational Research Journal and Educational Researcher.

In The Last Decade

David Blazar

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achieve... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2018 2016 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Blazar United States 14 1.2k 296 222 111 98 34 1.5k
Andrew J. Wayne United States 9 1.3k 1.1× 206 0.7× 208 0.9× 94 0.8× 86 0.9× 23 1.5k
Teresa Duncan United States 7 1.2k 1.0× 609 2.1× 113 0.5× 216 1.9× 89 0.9× 8 1.6k
Beng Huat See United Kingdom 22 1.3k 1.0× 279 0.9× 104 0.5× 118 1.1× 161 1.6× 117 1.7k
Julia H. Kaufman United States 17 1.1k 0.9× 207 0.7× 143 0.6× 70 0.6× 59 0.6× 98 1.4k
Laura Overman United States 11 855 0.7× 213 0.7× 153 0.7× 100 0.9× 173 1.8× 19 1.2k
Alison Black United States 9 869 0.7× 346 1.2× 91 0.4× 76 0.7× 110 1.1× 14 1.3k
Yvonne Goddard United States 14 1.3k 1.1× 278 0.9× 161 0.7× 166 1.5× 158 1.6× 21 1.6k
Beth A. Scarloss United States 6 886 0.7× 334 1.1× 103 0.5× 60 0.5× 65 0.7× 8 1.1k
Hans Anand Pant Germany 17 545 0.4× 176 0.6× 135 0.6× 91 0.8× 36 0.4× 57 810
Cynthia Lake United States 13 1.0k 0.8× 712 2.4× 99 0.4× 42 0.4× 68 0.7× 28 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by David Blazar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Blazar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Blazar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Blazar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Blazar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Blazar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Blazar. The network helps show where David Blazar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Blazar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Blazar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Blazar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Blazar. David Blazar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Blazar, David, et al.. (2024). Differential Responses to Teacher Evaluation Incentives: Expectancy, Race, Experience, and Task. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 47(4). 1314–1340. 1 indexed citations
3.
Liu, Jing, et al.. (2024). Computer Science for All? The Impact of High School Computer Science Courses on College Majors and Earnings. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
4.
Blazar, David, et al.. (2024). Do Grow-Your-Own Programs Work? Evidence from the Teacher Academy of Maryland. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bryan, Christopher J., Cameron A. Hecht, David Blazar, Matthew A. Kraft, & Oddny Judith Solheim. (2021). Global Mindset Initiative Working Paper 2: Designing an Intervention to Motivate Growth Mindset-Supportive Teaching Practices. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations
6.
Blazar, David, Thomas J. Kane, Morgan S. Polikoff, et al.. (2020). Curriculum Reform in The Common Core Era: Evaluating Elementary Math Textbooks Across Six U.S. States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 39(4). 966–1019. 11 indexed citations
7.
Blazar, David. (2020). Teacher Coaching to Improve Instruction at Scale: Opportunities and Challenges in Policy Contexts. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 122(10). 1–9. 3 indexed citations
8.
Kane, Thomas J., et al.. (2019). Can Video Technology Improve Teacher Evaluations? An Experimental Study. Education Finance and Policy. 15(3). 397–427. 3 indexed citations
9.
Kraft, Matthew A. & David Blazar. (2018). Taking Teacher Coaching to Scale: Can Personalized Training Become Standard Practice?.. Education next. 18(4). 68–74. 7 indexed citations
10.
Kraft, Matthew A., et al.. (2018). The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence. Review of Educational Research. 88(4). 547–588. 604 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Blazar, David, et al.. (2018). Using Tablets to Explore the Potential for Video-based Classroom Observations for Research and Professional Development. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology. 6(2). 122–135. 4 indexed citations
12.
Blazar, David, et al.. (2017). Does Test Preparation Mean Low-Quality Instruction?. Educational Researcher. 46(8). 420–433. 18 indexed citations
13.
Blazar, David, et al.. (2016). What Does It Mean to Be Ranked a “High” or “Low” Value-Added Teacher? Observing Differences in Instructional Quality Across Districts. American Educational Research Journal. 53(2). 324–359. 28 indexed citations
14.
Blazar, David & Matthew A. Kraft. (2016). Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 39(1). 146–170. 337 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Blazar, David, et al.. (2015). Dimensionality of Upper Elementary Mathematics Instruction: Exploring Factors across Two Observational Instruments.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.
16.
Hill, Heather C., David Blazar, & Kathleen Lynch. (2015). Resources for Teaching. AERA Open. 1(4). 42 indexed citations
17.
Blazar, David. (2015). Grade Assignments and the Teacher Pipeline. Educational Researcher. 44(4). 213–227. 40 indexed citations
18.
Blazar, David & Matthew A. Kraft. (2015). Exploring Mechanisms of Effective Teacher Coaching. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 37(4). 542–566. 52 indexed citations
19.
Kraft, Matthew A. & David Blazar. (2013). Improving Teacher Practice: Experimental Evidence on Individualized Teacher Coaching.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 1 indexed citations
20.
Blazar, David. (2009). Self-Discovery through Character Connections: Opening Up to Gayness in Angels in America. The English Journal. 98(4). 77–84. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026