Dave Harley

595 citations
15 papers · 301 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dave Harley

14 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Dave Harley
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 22
  • Human-Computer Interaction 72
  • Demography 101
  • Communication 28
  • Sociology and Political Science 115
Replace Andrea Rosales with:
Andrea Rosales Spain
Regina Juchun Chu Taiwan
Päivi Rasi Finland
Kayla D. Hales United States
Christopher Martin Canada
Thomas M. Cavanagh United States
Linda De George‐Walker Australia
Amanda M. Kimbrough United States
Leman Pınar Tosun Türkiye
Hadar Nesher Shoshan Germany
Dave Harley relative to Andrea Rosales Spain Andrea Rosales's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Andrea Rosales · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dave Harley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dave Harley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dave Harley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dave Harley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dave Harley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dave Harley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dave Harley. The network helps show where Dave Harley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Dave Harley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dave Harley Line = papers co-authored together Dave Harley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200781
2 200880
3 200851
4 200920
5 201117
6 201815
7 19919
8 20177
9
Appropriation of social networking by older people: two case studies
20125
10 20074
11 20164
12 20224
13
Wii Gaming for Older Players: From Motivation to Appropriation, and Usability to User Experience.
20092
14 20152
15
The Link between Digital Disconnection and Death Anxiety: a Preliminary Study
20190

About Dave Harley

Dave Harley is a scholar working on Demography, Human-Computer Interaction, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Education and Urban Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (9 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Mind wandering and attention (1 paper) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (22 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (72 citations), Demography (101 citations), Communication (28 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (115 citations). Dave Harley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Paula Wilcox, Frank Vetere, Hannah Frith, Sri Kurniawan, Julie Morgan, Kate Howland, Sri Kurniawan and Ann Light. Their work appears in journals such as Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Computers in Human Behavior, Universal Access in the Information Society, The Journal of Community Informatics and University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact