Danielle Pollock

12.6k total citations · 7 hit papers
74 papers, 6.9k citations indexed

About

Danielle Pollock is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Danielle Pollock has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 6.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in General Health Professions, 21 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Danielle Pollock's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (21 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (18 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (15 papers). Danielle Pollock is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (21 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (18 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (15 papers). Danielle Pollock collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Danielle Pollock's co-authors include Andrea C. Tricco, Zachary Munn, Hanan Khalil, Christina Godfrey, Micah D.J. Peters, Patricia McInerney, Lyndsay Alexander, Casey Marnie, Ashrita Saran and Cindy Stern and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Danielle Pollock

62 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Hit Papers

5 papers align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

2020 3.4k citations Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie et al. JBI Evidence Synthesis profile →
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

2021 799 citations Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie et al. profile →
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

2022 762 citations Danielle Pollock, Micah D.J. Peters et al. JBI Evidence Synthesis profile →
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols

2022 566 citations Micah D.J. Peters, Christina Godfrey et al. JBI Evidence Synthesis profile →
Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics

2021 431 citations Danielle Pollock, Micah D.J. Peters et al. profile →
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family

2023 130 citations Fiona Campbell, Andrea C. Tricco et al. profile →
Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group

2022 84 citations Danielle Pollock, Lyndsay Alexander et al. JBI Evidence Synthesis profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Danielle Pollock Australia	17	2.0k	1.3k	1.0k	759	582	74	6.9k
Lyndsay Alexander United Kingdom	13	1.7k 0.9×	1.1k 0.8×	821 0.8×	643 0.8×	481 0.8×	46	6.0k
Quan Nha Hong Canada	23	2.5k 1.3×	1.3k 1.0×	1.1k 1.1×	726 1.0×	530 0.9×	62	6.8k
Gillian Bartlett Canada	28	2.2k 1.1×	1.4k 1.0×	1000 1.0×	609 0.8×	529 0.9×	95	6.9k
Ann Dorrit Guassora Denmark	16	2.1k 1.1×	1.4k 1.0×	1.1k 1.1×	962 1.3×	522 0.9×	46	6.6k
Craig Lockwood Australia	31	2.3k 1.2×	1.3k 1.0×	869 0.9×	699 0.9×	556 1.0×	180	6.8k
Kate Flemming United Kingdom	35	2.0k 1.0×	1.6k 1.2×	904 0.9×	643 0.8×	725 1.2×	89	6.3k
Cássia Baldini Soares Brazil	19	2.6k 1.3×	1.5k 1.1×	1.1k 1.0×	934 1.2×	591 1.0×	127	8.0k
Gemma Heath United Kingdom	12	2.8k 1.4×	1.6k 1.2×	1.1k 1.1×	821 1.1×	923 1.6×	32	7.2k
Mary Kay Rayens United States	43	1.4k 0.7×	1.0k 0.8×	1.3k 1.2×	790 1.0×	576 1.0×	310	6.9k
Monika Kastner Canada	32	2.2k 1.1×	1.2k 0.9×	646 0.6×	731 1.0×	384 0.7×	101	6.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Pollock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Pollock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Pollock. The network helps show where Danielle Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle Pollock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle Pollock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle Pollock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle Pollock. Danielle Pollock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Barker, Timothy Hugh, et al.. (2025). Prevalence of cancer-related cognitive impairment in pediatric patients and survivors of non-CNS cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv.

Stern, Cindy, Danielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, et al.. (2025). Protocol for the Development of The Australian Motor Neurone Disease (MND) Guideline. 3(1).

Khalil, Hanan, Érica Brandão de Moraes, Zachary Munn, et al.. (2025). Scoping reviews and their role in identifying research priorities. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 181. 111712–111712. 5 indexed citations

Barker, Timothy Hugh, et al.. (2025). Prevalence of cancer-related cognitive impairment in pediatric patients and survivors of non-CNS cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 176. 106283–106283.

Stern, Cindy, Nipun Shrestha, Sabira Hasanoff, et al.. (2025). Guidelines addressing Motor Neurone Disease (MND): a scoping review. Neurodegenerative Disease Management. 1–16. 1 indexed citations

Khalil, Hanan, Danielle Pollock, Patricia McInerney, et al.. (2024). Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews. Research Synthesis Methods. 15(6). 839–850. 10 indexed citations

Barker, Timothy Hugh, Amanda Ross‐White, Danielle Pollock, et al.. (2024). Tools, techniques, methods, and processes for the detection and mitigation of fraudulent or erroneous data in evidence synthesis: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 23(3). 536–545. 4 indexed citations

Barker, Timothy Hugh, Mafalda M. Dias, Raju Kanukula, et al.. (2024). Contextual factors related to vector-control interventions for malaria: a scoping review and evidence and gap map protocol. F1000Research. 13. 226–226.

Khalil, Hanan, Fiona Campbell, Danielle Pollock, et al.. (2024). Advancing the methodology of mapping reviews: A scoping review. Research Synthesis Methods. 15(3). 384–397. 15 indexed citations

10.

Pollock, Danielle, et al.. (2023). Effectiveness of erector spinae plane block for rib fracture analgesia: a systematic review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 22(4). 706–712. 1 indexed citations

11.

Garritty, Chantelle, Andrea C. Tricco, Maureen Smith, et al.. (2023). Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users. BMJ evidence-based medicine. 29(1). 55–61. 29 indexed citations

12.

Pollock, Danielle, Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone, et al.. (2023). Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study. Research Synthesis Methods. 15(2). 257–274. 2 indexed citations

13.

Pollock, Danielle, et al.. (2023). “Chemobrain” in childhood cancer survivors—the impact on social, academic, and daily living skills: a qualitative systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer. 31(9). 532–532. 6 indexed citations

14.

Pollock, Danielle, Micah D.J. Peters, Hanan Khalil, et al.. (2022). Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 21(3). 520–532. 762 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Cleary, Anne, Julie Dean, Danielle Pollock, Lisa McDaid, & Frances M. Boyle. (2021). Nature-based interventions for bereavement care: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 20(5). 1344–1352. 1 indexed citations

16.

Knight, Alissa, Danielle Pollock, Frances M. Boyle, Dell Horey, & Jane Warland. (2021). Evidence available to guide care during labor and birth for women and their partners who know their baby will be stillborn: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 19(8). 1984–1991. 1 indexed citations

17.

Pollock, Danielle, Margaret Murphy, Joann O’Leary, & Jane Warland. (2020). Pregnancy after loss during the COVID19 pandemic. Women and Birth. 33(6). 540–543. 8 indexed citations

18.

Peters, Micah D.J., Casey Marnie, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 18(10). 2119–2126. 3426 indexed citations breakdown →

19.

Khalil, Hanan, Micah D.J. Peters, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.. (2020). Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 130. 156–160. 183 indexed citations

20.

Pollock, Danielle, Tahereh Ziaian, Elissa Pearson, Megan Cooper, & Jane Warland. (2019). Breaking through the silence in antenatal care: Fetal movement and stillbirth education. Women and Birth. 33(1). 77–85. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact