Danielle Pollock

12.6k citations
74 papers · 6.9k indexed · 7 hit papers · h-index 17

Danielle Pollock

62 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Hit Papers

Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evide...130202020262022202410002.0k3.0k

Peers

Danielle Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Health Informatics 150
  • Research and Theory 71
  • General Health Professions 2.0k
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 64
  • Clinical Psychology 1.0k
Replace Lyndsay Alexander with:
Lyndsay Alexander United Kingdom
Casey Marnie Australia
Alexa McArthur Australia
Cássia Baldini Soares Brazil
Quan Nha Hong Canada
Deborah Parker Australia
Pierre Pluye Canada
Pierre Pluye Canada
Gillian Bartlett Canada
Frances Griffiths United Kingdom
Danielle Pollock relative to Lyndsay Alexander United Kingdom Lyndsay Alexander's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lyndsay Alexander · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Pollock. The network helps show where Danielle Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20250
3 20251
4 20250
5 20250
6 202415
7 20242
8 202423
9 202412
10 20240
11 202428
12 20240
13 202412
14 20231
15 20231
16 202312
17 20236
18 20221
19 202257
20 20215

About Danielle Pollock

Danielle Pollock is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Health Informatics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 6.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (21 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (18 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (15 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (9 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (150 citations), Research and Theory (71 citations) and General Health Professions (2.0k citations). Danielle Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrea C. Tricco, Zachary Munn, Hanan Khalil, Christina Godfrey, Micah D.J. Peters, Patricia McInerney, Lyndsay Alexander, Casey Marnie, Ashrita Saran and Cindy Stern. Their work appears in journals such as JBI Evidence Synthesis, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Women and Birth, Research Synthesis Methods and BMJ evidence-based medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026