Jennifer Stone
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Zachary MunnTimothy Hugh BarkerEdoardo AromatarisMiloslav KlugarJo Leonardi‐BeeKim SearsCătălin TufănaruSuhail A.R. Doi
- Topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (25 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (18 papers)Delphi Technique in Research (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Applied Microbiology and BiotechnologyStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyHealth Informatics
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jennifer Stone
45 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- Epidemiology 212
- Surgery 209
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 203
- General Health Professions 190
- Clinical Psychology 140
Countries citing papers authored by Jennifer Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of Jennifer Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jennifer Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jennifer Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jennifer Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jennifer Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jennifer Stone. The network helps show where Jennifer Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jennifer Stone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jennifer Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jennifer Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jennifer Stone. Jennifer Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studiesbreakdown → | 215 |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trialsbreakdown → | 468 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 119 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Jennifer Stone
Jennifer Stone is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (25 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (18 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (43 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (115 citations) and Health Informatics (19 citations). Jennifer Stone has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Zachary Munn, Timothy Hugh Barker, Edoardo Aromataris, Miloslav Klugar, Jo Leonardi‐Bee, Kim Sears, Cătălin Tufănaru, Suhail A.R. Doi, Kathryn Glass and Peter Tugwell. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and PLoS Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.