Megan Cooper

612 total citations
50 papers, 374 citations indexed

About

Megan Cooper is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Megan Cooper has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 374 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15 papers in General Health Professions and 15 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Megan Cooper's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (20 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers). Megan Cooper is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (20 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers). Megan Cooper collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Megan Cooper's co-authors include Jane Warland, Danielle Pollock, Tahereh Ziaian, Elissa Pearson, Helen McCutcheon, Ethel Burns, Claire Feeley, Michael J Shoemaker, Jennifer Stephenson and Kerry Hodge and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Trauma Violence & Abuse and Midwifery.

In The Last Decade

Megan Cooper

46 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Megan Cooper Australia 12 172 140 126 102 96 50 374
Margaret Carroll Ireland 14 271 1.6× 75 0.5× 277 2.2× 181 1.8× 80 0.8× 32 577
Maria Ekelin Sweden 14 148 0.9× 74 0.5× 209 1.7× 230 2.3× 72 0.8× 24 477
Songül Aktaş Türkiye 12 178 1.0× 136 1.0× 206 1.6× 100 1.0× 41 0.4× 38 390
Hazel Keedle Australia 11 288 1.7× 125 0.9× 167 1.3× 171 1.7× 50 0.5× 43 404
Ayden Çoban Türkiye 11 84 0.5× 94 0.7× 172 1.4× 66 0.6× 64 0.7× 46 395
Iman Al Hashmi Oman 10 48 0.3× 79 0.6× 61 0.5× 23 0.2× 62 0.6× 37 252
Ayşe Deliktaş Demirci Türkiye 11 100 0.6× 110 0.8× 93 0.7× 70 0.7× 57 0.6× 28 276
Xujuan Zheng China 11 118 0.7× 139 1.0× 240 1.9× 67 0.7× 45 0.5× 36 417
Susan Wilkinson United States 10 122 0.7× 55 0.4× 178 1.4× 33 0.3× 54 0.6× 23 330
Leesa Van Niekerk Australia 12 77 0.4× 57 0.4× 121 1.0× 55 0.5× 41 0.4× 34 350

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Cooper. The network helps show where Megan Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Cooper. Megan Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lines, Lauren, Helen McLaren, Donna Hartz, et al.. (2025). Are we educating the future workforce for interprofessional responses to child maltreatment? An exploratory study. Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia. 32(6). 371–380.
3.
Stevens, Matthew, et al.. (2024). Screening and early intervention for substance use during pregnancy: A retrospective case note review of antenatal care records. Drug and Alcohol Review. 43(7). 1817–1828. 2 indexed citations
4.
Lines, Lauren, Helen McLaren, Megan Cooper, et al.. (2024). Graduate qualities for preservice health and welfare professionals for collaborative prevention and early intervention for child maltreatment: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice. 81. 104176–104176.
5.
Stevens, Matthew, Megan Cooper, Lynette Cusack, Robert Ali, & Annette Briley. (2024). Improving the quality of antenatal screening and early intervention for alcohol and other drug use: protocol for a multi-stage approach to systems reform. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. 19(1). 2–2. 1 indexed citations
6.
Cooper, Megan & Annette Briley. (2023). Sense of coherence as facilitated by water immersion during labour and birth: A concept analysis and synthesis. Midwifery. 126. 103824–103824. 1 indexed citations
8.
Cooper, Megan & Jane Warland. (2022). The views and perceptions of water immersion for labor and birth from women who had birthed in Australia but had not used the option. European Journal of Midwifery. 6(August). 1–10. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cooper, Megan, Danielle Pollock, Jane Warland, & Sarven S. McLinton. (2022). The development of the W A + E R (water immersion agency plus expectations and relief) scale. Midwifery. 109. 103298–103298. 1 indexed citations
10.
Feeley, Claire, Megan Cooper, & Ethel Burns. (2021). A systematic meta‐thematic synthesis to examine the views and experiences of women following water immersion during labour and waterbirth. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(7). 2942–2956. 17 indexed citations
12.
Cooper, Megan & Jane Warland. (2019). What are the benefits? Are they concerned? Women's experiences of water immersion for labor and birth. Midwifery. 79. 102541–102541. 11 indexed citations
13.
Pollock, Danielle, Tahereh Ziaian, Elissa Pearson, Megan Cooper, & Jane Warland. (2019). Breaking through the silence in antenatal care: Fetal movement and stillbirth education. Women and Birth. 33(1). 77–85. 12 indexed citations
14.
Pollock, Danielle, et al.. (2019). Voices of the unheard: A qualitative survey exploring bereaved parents experiences of stillbirth stigma. Women and Birth. 33(2). 165–174. 40 indexed citations
15.
Kemp, Coral, Jennifer Stephenson, Megan Cooper, & Kerry Hodge. (2019). The Use of Peer Mediation and Educator Facilitation to Promote Turn Taking in Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Inclusive Childcare. Infants & Young Children. 32(3). 151–171. 8 indexed citations
16.
Steen, Mary, et al.. (2018). Transitional experiences of internationally qualified midwives practising in Australia – An E-survey. 16(4). 120–127. 1 indexed citations
17.
Cooper, Megan, Helen McCutcheon, & Jane Warland. (2018). Water immersion policies and guidelines: How are they informed?. Women and Birth. 32(3). 246–254. 10 indexed citations
18.
Cooper, Megan, Jane Warland, & Helen McCutcheon. (2018). Practitioner accreditation for the practice of water immersion during labour and birth: Results from a mixed methods study. Women and Birth. 32(3). 255–262. 8 indexed citations
19.
Cooper, Megan, Jane Warland, & Helen McCutcheon. (2017). Australian midwives views and experiences of practice and politics related to water immersion for labour and birth: A web based survey. Women and Birth. 31(3). 184–193. 14 indexed citations
20.
Cooper, Megan & Jane Warland. (2010). Improving women's knowledge of prostaglandin induction of labour through the use of information brochures: A quasi-experimental study. Women and Birth. 24(4). 156–164. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026