Micah D.J. Peters

74.8k total citations · 13 hit papers
105 papers, 22.3k citations indexed

About

Micah D.J. Peters is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Micah D.J. Peters has authored 105 papers receiving a total of 22.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in General Health Professions, 23 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 20 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Micah D.J. Peters's work include Delphi Technique in Research (15 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (12 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers). Micah D.J. Peters is often cited by papers focused on Delphi Technique in Research (15 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (12 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers). Micah D.J. Peters collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and South Africa. Micah D.J. Peters's co-authors include Zachary Munn, Christina Godfrey, Hanan Khalil, Patricia McInerney, Cindy Stern, Edoardo Aromataris, Cătălin Tufănaru, Alexa McArthur, Cássia Baldini Soares and Deborah Parker and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Environmental Management and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

In The Last Decade

Micah D.J. Peters

95 papers receiving 21.8k citations

Hit Papers

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2018 2015 2020 2015 2021 2.0k 4.0k 6.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Micah D.J. Peters Australia 30 5.8k 4.1k 3.1k 2.6k 1.8k 105 22.3k
Zachary Munn Australia 47 6.2k 1.1× 4.5k 1.1× 3.5k 1.1× 2.6k 1.0× 2.2k 1.2× 228 27.6k
Heather Colquhoun Canada 28 6.4k 1.1× 3.5k 0.9× 2.5k 0.8× 2.1k 0.8× 1.4k 0.8× 95 18.4k
Ulla Hällgren Graneheim Sweden 27 6.7k 1.2× 3.9k 1.0× 4.1k 1.3× 2.8k 1.1× 2.1k 1.2× 71 19.0k
Lisa O’Malley United Kingdom 10 7.0k 1.2× 4.4k 1.1× 3.7k 1.2× 3.0k 1.2× 1.8k 1.0× 13 24.2k
Catherine Pope United Kingdom 50 8.4k 1.5× 4.4k 1.1× 2.6k 0.8× 2.9k 1.1× 1.7k 0.9× 195 21.1k
Andrea C. Tricco Canada 70 6.6k 1.1× 4.9k 1.2× 2.3k 0.7× 2.7k 1.1× 1.7k 0.9× 344 25.9k
Satu Elo Finland 19 5.3k 0.9× 3.4k 0.8× 3.0k 1.0× 3.2k 1.2× 1.5k 0.8× 51 19.1k
Alicia O’Cathain United Kingdom 53 8.0k 1.4× 3.5k 0.9× 2.5k 0.8× 1.7k 0.6× 1.5k 0.8× 189 18.1k
Helvi Kyngäs Finland 42 6.4k 1.1× 3.9k 1.0× 3.7k 1.2× 3.5k 1.4× 2.4k 1.3× 182 23.2k
James Thomas United Kingdom 80 7.6k 1.3× 5.4k 1.3× 3.9k 1.2× 2.9k 1.1× 3.2k 1.7× 485 29.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Micah D.J. Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Micah D.J. Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Micah D.J. Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Micah D.J. Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Micah D.J. Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Micah D.J. Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Micah D.J. Peters. The network helps show where Micah D.J. Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Micah D.J. Peters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Micah D.J. Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Micah D.J. Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Micah D.J. Peters. Micah D.J. Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Khalil, Hanan, Danielle Pollock, Patricia McInerney, et al.. (2024). Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews. Research Synthesis Methods. 15(6). 839–850. 10 indexed citations
4.
Peters, Micah D.J., et al.. (2024). Enablers and barriers to nurse practitioners working in Australian aged care: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 158. 104861–104861. 2 indexed citations
5.
Matricciani, Lisa, Kristin Graham, Lyn Gum, et al.. (2024). Sleep of Nurses: A Comprehensive Scoping Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 81(5). 2333–2344. 3 indexed citations
6.
Douglas, Jane, et al.. (2024). Defining nurse‐led models of care: Contemporary approaches to nursing. International Nursing Review. 72(1). e13076–e13076. 2 indexed citations
7.
Marnie, Casey, et al.. (2023). Up next on the agenda: evidence-based reforms and reform-driven research. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 40(4). 1 indexed citations
8.
Pollock, Danielle, Micah D.J. Peters, Hanan Khalil, et al.. (2022). Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 21(3). 520–532. 762 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Peters, Micah D.J. & Casey Marnie. (2022). Nurse practitioner models of care in aged care: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 20(8). 2064–2070. 1 indexed citations
10.
Marnie, Casey, Micah D.J. Peters, Kate Kennedy, et al.. (2020). Recency of Practice and the Maintenance of Professional Competence for Nurses and Midwives: A Scoping Review Protocol.. PubMed. 27(4). 1008–1013. 1 indexed citations
11.
Peters, Micah D.J., Casey Marnie, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 18(10). 2119–2126. 3426 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Khalil, Hanan, Micah D.J. Peters, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.. (2020). Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 130. 156–160. 183 indexed citations
14.
Peters, Micah D.J., et al.. (2019). Probiotics and human lactational mastitis. The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. Publish Ahead of Print(6). 1341–1348. 7 indexed citations
15.
Munn, Zachary, Micah D.J. Peters, Cindy Stern, et al.. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 18(1). 143–143. 7124 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Peters, Micah D.J.. (2018). Nursing research: From integration with clinical practice to future science. 26(2). 31.
17.
Peters, Micah D.J., et al.. (2017). Reflection in the training of nurses in clinical practice settings: a scoping review protocol. The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 15(12). 2871–2880. 17 indexed citations
18.
Peters, Micah D.J., Christina Godfrey, Hanan Khalil, et al.. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 13(3). 141–146. 5042 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Peters, Micah D.J., et al.. (2015). An evidence-based approach to the prevention and initial management of skin tears within the aged community setting: a best practice implementation project. The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 13(5). 421–443.
20.
Ooi, Eng H., et al.. (2015). Swallowing outcomes following primary surgical resection and primary free flap reconstruction for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a systematic review protocol. The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 13(8). 120–134. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026