Andrea C. Tricco

222.9k total citations · 21 hit papers
344 papers, 25.9k citations indexed

About

Andrea C. Tricco is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrea C. Tricco has authored 344 papers receiving a total of 25.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 103 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 92 papers in General Health Professions and 56 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Andrea C. Tricco's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (100 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (51 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (50 papers). Andrea C. Tricco is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (100 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (51 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (50 papers). Andrea C. Tricco collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Andrea C. Tricco's co-authors include Sharon E. Straus, David Moher, Hanan Khalil, Micah D.J. Peters, Danielle Pollock, Zachary Munn, Christina Godfrey, Patricia McInerney, Lyndsay Alexander and Casey Marnie and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Andrea C. Tricco

330 papers receiving 25.3k citations

Hit Papers

Updated methodological gui... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2020 2014 2016 2021 2015 1000 2.0k 3.0k
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
    2020 3.4k citations Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie et al. JBI Evidence Synthesis profile →
  2. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting
    2014 2.0k citations Heather Colquhoun, Danielle Levac et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology profile →
  3. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
    2016 1.4k citations Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie et al. profile →
  4. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
    2021 799 citations Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie et al. profile →
  5. A scoping review of rapid review methods
    2015 768 citations Andrea C. Tricco, Jesmin Antony et al. profile →
  6. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews
    2022 762 citations Danielle Pollock, Micah D.J. Peters et al. JBI Evidence Synthesis profile →
  7. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
    2007 624 citations David Moher, Andrea C. Tricco et al. profile →
  8. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols
    2022 566 citations Micah D.J. Peters, Christina Godfrey et al. JBI Evidence Synthesis profile →
  9. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    2012 484 citations Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher et al. profile →
  10. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
    2016 476 citations Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher et al. profile →
  11. Harassment and Discrimination in Medical Training
    2014 456 citations Charlene Soobiah, Erin Lillie et al. profile →
  12. Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
    2021 431 citations Danielle Pollock, Micah D.J. Peters et al. Journal of Advanced Nursing profile →
  13. Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
    2021 418 citations Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie et al. Systematic Reviews profile →
  14. Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement
    2022 418 citations Dawid Pieper, Andrea C. Tricco et al. profile →
  15. Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews
    2021 408 citations Rhéa Rocque, Ruth Ndjaboué et al. BMJ Open profile →
  16. Comparisons of Interventions for Preventing Falls in Older Adults
    2017 395 citations Andrea C. Tricco, Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. profile →
  17. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
    2018 313 citations Andrea C. Tricco et al. Systematic Reviews profile →
  18. Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension
    2020 278 citations Sharon E. Straus, David Moher et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology profile →
  19. Exploring the prevalence of gaming disorder and Internet gaming disorder: a rapid scoping review
    2020 152 citations Nazia Darvesh, Amruta Radhakrishnan et al. Systematic Reviews profile →
  20. Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
    2023 130 citations Andrea C. Tricco, Zachary Munn et al. Systematic Reviews profile →
  21. Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group
    2022 84 citations Danielle Pollock, Lyndsay Alexander et al. JBI Evidence Synthesis profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrea C. Tricco Canada 70 6.6k 4.9k 2.8k 2.7k 2.5k 344 25.9k
James Thomas United Kingdom 80 7.6k 1.2× 5.4k 1.1× 2.2k 0.8× 2.9k 1.1× 1.7k 0.7× 485 29.8k
Andrew Booth United Kingdom 73 10.3k 1.6× 5.4k 1.1× 2.1k 0.8× 3.4k 1.2× 1.9k 0.7× 453 30.7k
Larissa Shamseer Canada 28 3.8k 0.6× 4.6k 0.9× 3.6k 1.3× 1.9k 0.7× 2.5k 1.0× 66 34.9k
Zachary Munn Australia 47 6.2k 0.9× 4.5k 0.9× 2.9k 1.0× 2.6k 0.9× 785 0.3× 228 27.6k
Ian R. White United Kingdom 82 5.7k 0.9× 5.9k 1.2× 4.6k 1.7× 2.4k 0.9× 2.5k 1.0× 445 43.5k
Isabelle Boutron France 62 4.5k 0.7× 4.9k 1.0× 2.8k 1.0× 1.5k 0.5× 5.0k 2.0× 248 30.0k
Davina Ghersi Australia 36 4.3k 0.6× 5.8k 1.2× 4.1k 1.5× 1.8k 0.7× 2.3k 0.9× 62 40.8k
Sharon E. Straus Canada 88 13.1k 2.0× 8.7k 1.8× 3.9k 1.4× 2.5k 0.9× 2.4k 1.0× 591 41.2k
Vivian Welch Canada 65 4.7k 0.7× 3.8k 0.8× 2.1k 0.8× 1.3k 0.5× 1.2k 0.5× 297 26.4k
Mary Dixon‐Woods United Kingdom 60 8.8k 1.3× 4.8k 1.0× 1.7k 0.6× 2.2k 0.8× 771 0.3× 214 22.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrea C. Tricco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea C. Tricco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea C. Tricco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea C. Tricco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea C. Tricco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea C. Tricco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea C. Tricco. The network helps show where Andrea C. Tricco may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea C. Tricco

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea C. Tricco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea C. Tricco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea C. Tricco. Andrea C. Tricco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Uttley, Lesley, Louise Falzon, Jennifer A. Byrne, et al.. (2024). Research culture influences in health and biomedical research: rapid scoping review and content analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 178. 111616–111616.
2.
Stevens, Adrienne, Mona Hersi, Chantelle Garritty, et al.. (2024). Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews. BMJ evidence-based medicine. 30(2). 118–123. 9 indexed citations
3.
Khalil, Hanan, Danielle Pollock, Patricia McInerney, et al.. (2024). Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews. Research Synthesis Methods. 15(6). 839–850. 10 indexed citations
4.
Cloutier, Paula, Jean Daniel Jacob, Erin P. Hambrick, et al.. (2024). Youth, caregiver and healthcare professional perspectives on planning the implementation of a trauma‐informed care programme: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 81(10). 6602–6624. 1 indexed citations
5.
Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, KM, Ani Movsisyan, Kavita Kothari, et al.. (2023). Effectiveness of SARS‐CoV‐2 testing strategies: A scoping review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(9). e12030–e12030. 2 indexed citations
6.
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Huda Ashoor, Patricia Rios, et al.. (2022). Comparative safety and efficacy of cognitive enhancers for Alzheimer’s dementia: a systematic review with individual patient data network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 12(4). e053012–e053012. 19 indexed citations
7.
Khalil, Hanan & Andrea C. Tricco. (2022). Differentiating between mapping reviews and scoping reviews in the evidence synthesis ecosystem. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 149. 175–182. 58 indexed citations
8.
Chesney, Tyler R., Camilla L. Wong, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.. (2022). Frailty assessment tools for use by surgeons when evaluating older adults prior to surgery: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 12(7). e061951–e061951. 3 indexed citations
9.
Pham, Ba’, Patricia Rios, Amruta Radhakrishnan, et al.. (2022). Comparative-effectiveness research of COVID-19 treatment: a rapid scoping review. BMJ Open. 12(6). e045115–e045115. 8 indexed citations
10.
Pollock, Danielle, Micah D.J. Peters, Hanan Khalil, et al.. (2022). Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 21(3). 520–532. 762 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Okoli, George N., Olt Lam, Leslie Copstein, et al.. (2021). Interventions to improve early cancer diagnosis of symptomatic individuals: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 11(11). e055488–e055488. 8 indexed citations
12.
Lunny, Carole, Andrea C. Tricco, Areti‐Angeliki Veroniki, et al.. (2021). Methodological review to develop a list of bias items used to assess reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: protocol and rationale. BMJ Open. 11(6). e045987–e045987. 7 indexed citations
13.
Rocque, Rhéa, Ruth Ndjaboué, Laura Cameron, et al.. (2021). Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 11(6). e046333–e046333. 408 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Peters, Micah D.J., Casey Marnie, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 18(10). 2119–2126. 3426 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Jesmin Antony, Sharon E. Straus, et al.. (2018). Comparative safety and effectiveness of perinatal antiretroviral therapies for HIV-infected women and their children: Systematic review and network meta-analysis including different study designs. PLoS ONE. 13(6). e0198447–e0198447. 18 indexed citations
16.
Jackson, Dan, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Martin Law, Andrea C. Tricco, & Rose Baker. (2017). Paule‐Mandel estimators for network meta‐analysis with random inconsistency effects. Research Synthesis Methods. 8(4). 416–434. 25 indexed citations
17.
18.
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Patricia Rios, Elise Cogo, et al.. (2017). Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs for neurological development in children exposed during pregnancy and breast feeding: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 7(7). e017248–e017248. 129 indexed citations
19.
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Charlene Soobiah, Andrea C. Tricco, Meghan J. Elliott, & Sharon E. Straus. (2015). Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open. 5(4). e007103–e007103. 17 indexed citations
20.
Colquhoun, Heather, Danielle Levac, Kelly K. O’Brien, et al.. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 67(12). 1291–1294. 2037 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James Thomas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Booth Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Larissa Shamseer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zachary Munn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ian R. White Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Isabelle Boutron Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Davina Ghersi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sharon E. Straus Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vivian Welch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Dixon‐Woods
Rankless by CCL
2026