Anna Mae Scott

4.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
83 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Anna Mae Scott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Mae Scott has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in General Health Professions, 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 12 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Anna Mae Scott's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers) and COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (8 papers). Anna Mae Scott is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers) and COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (8 papers). Anna Mae Scott collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Anna Mae Scott's co-authors include Justin Clark, Paul Glasziou, Chris Del Mar, Loai Albarqouni, Paulina Stehlik, Mark Jones, Ray Moynihan, Anne Duggan, Alexandra Bannach‐Brown and Zoe A Michaleff and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Anna Mae Scott

80 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review

2021 791 citations Ray Moynihan, Sharon Sanders et al. BMJ Open profile →
A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study

2020 361 citations Justin Clark, Paul Glasziou et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Mae Scott Australia	25	622	449	414	316	298	83	2.7k
David S. Jones United States	24	697 1.1×	810 1.8×	201 0.5×	351 1.1×	349 1.2×	106	3.9k
Douglas M Salzwedel Canada	11	836 1.3×	652 1.5×	196 0.5×	255 0.8×	385 1.3×	21	3.6k
Vicki Foerster Canada	6	737 1.2×	587 1.3×	191 0.5×	217 0.7×	387 1.3×	13	3.3k
Elizabeth L. Turner United States	35	703 1.1×	761 1.7×	177 0.4×	259 0.8×	276 0.9×	151	3.4k
Gabriel Rada Chile	27	907 1.5×	617 1.4×	302 0.7×	597 1.9×	421 1.4×	169	3.7k
Sarah Cuschieri Malta	21	421 0.7×	520 1.2×	326 0.8×	149 0.5×	378 1.3×	127	3.5k
Nigel Stallard United Kingdom	36	363 0.6×	286 0.6×	199 0.5×	789 2.5×	249 0.8×	193	4.4k
Jean-Benoît Hardouin France	27	386 0.6×	300 0.7×	223 0.5×	203 0.6×	321 1.1×	171	3.1k
Soo Young Kim South Korea	28	366 0.6×	416 0.9×	394 1.0×	137 0.4×	512 1.7×	187	3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Mae Scott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Mae Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Mae Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Mae Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Mae Scott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Mae Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Mae Scott. The network helps show where Anna Mae Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Mae Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Mae Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Mae Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Mae Scott. Anna Mae Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Wilkinson, Shelley A., Anna Mae Scott, Lisa Vincze, et al.. (2025). Effective dietary interventions during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of behavior change techniques to promote healthy eating. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 25(1). 112–112. 3 indexed citations

Bakhit, Mina, Mark Jones, Justin Clark, et al.. (2024). Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. 45(12). 998–1013. 23 indexed citations

Scott, Anna Mae, et al.. (2024). Perceptions of genomic newborn screening: a cross-sectional survey conducted with UK medical students. BMJ Open. 14(9). e089108–e089108. 1 indexed citations

Mahtani, Kamal R, et al.. (2024). Leadership development programmes in healthcare research: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-aggregation. BMJ Leader. 8(4). 283–292. 1 indexed citations

Byambasuren, Oyungerel, Hannah Greenwood, Mina Bakhit, et al.. (2023). Comparison of Telephone and Video Telehealth Consultations: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25. e49942–e49942. 14 indexed citations

Yadav, Krishan, et al.. (2023). Misdiagnosis of Uncomplicated Cellulitis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 38(10). 2396–2404. 7 indexed citations

Whaley, Paul, et al.. (2023). Using bench protocol platforms to improve compliance with systematic review guidance documents and reporting checklists: Proof of concept. 1(1). 1 indexed citations

Barker, Timothy Hugh, Danielle Pollock, Jennifer Stone, et al.. (2023). How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts. Research Synthesis Methods. 14(3). 370–381. 12 indexed citations

Krzyżaniak, Natalia, Magnolia Cardona, Zoe A Michaleff, et al.. (2023). Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face rehabilitation in the management of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical Therapy Reviews. 28(2). 71–87. 17 indexed citations

10.

Pollock, Danielle, Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone, et al.. (2023). Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study. Research Synthesis Methods. 15(2). 257–274. 2 indexed citations

11.

Young, Adrienne, et al.. (2022). Co‐designing nutrition interventions with consumers: A scoping review. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 36(3). 1045–1067. 20 indexed citations

12.

Greenwood, Hannah, Natalia Krzyżaniak, Justin Clark, et al.. (2022). Telehealth Versus Face-to-face Psychotherapy for Less Common Mental Health Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JMIR Mental Health. 9(3). e31780–e31780. 65 indexed citations

13.

Scott, Anna Mae, Iain Chalmers, Adrian Barnett, et al.. (2021). ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47(12). e90–e90. 5 indexed citations

14.

Moynihan, Ray, Sharon Sanders, Zoe A Michaleff, et al.. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 11(3). e045343–e045343. 791 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Moro, Christian, Charlotte Phelps, Justin Clark, et al.. (2021). The effectiveness of parasympathomimetics for treating underactive bladder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 41(1). 127–139. 13 indexed citations

16.

Hoffmann, Tammy, Mina Bakhit, Natalia Krzyżaniak, et al.. (2021). Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysis. BMJ Open. 11(8). e046175–e046175. 8 indexed citations

17.

Bakhit, Mina, Natalia Krzyżaniak, Anna Mae Scott, et al.. (2020). Downsides of face masks and possible mitigation strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv. 7 indexed citations

18.

Moro, Christian, James Birt, Zane Štromberga, et al.. (2020). Virtual and Augmented Reality Enhancements to Medical and Science Student Physiology and Anatomy Test Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education. 14(3). 368–376. 168 indexed citations

19.

Thomas, Rae, Anna Mae Scott, Rebecca Sims, et al.. (2020). Exploring women’s priorities for the potential consequences of a gestational diabetes diagnosis: A pilot community jury. Health Expectations. 23(3). 593–602. 3 indexed citations

20.

Bryant, Elizabeth A., Anna Mae Scott, & Rae Thomas. (2020). Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 10(10). e037327–e037327. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact