Danielle N. Shapiro
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Jesse ChandlerPam MuellerAbigail J. StewartDaniel G. WhitneySeth WarschauskyJulie B. KaplowItay SissoMorton L. Moss
- Topics
- Cleft Lip and Palate Research (6 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenAustralia
In The Last Decade
Danielle N. Shapiro
28 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Clinical Psychology 1000
- Sociology and Political Science 590
- Social Psychology 440
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 414
- Applied Psychology 288
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle N. Shapiro
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle N. Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle N. Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle N. Shapiro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle N. Shapiro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle N. Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle N. Shapiro. The network helps show where Danielle N. Shapiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle N. Shapiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle N. Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle N. Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle N. Shapiro. Danielle N. Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 84 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | Neurilemoma: review of the literature and report of five cases. | 96 |
About Danielle N. Shapiro
Danielle N. Shapiro is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Family Practice and Demography, having authored 29 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cleft Lip and Palate Research (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (288 citations), Clinical Psychology (1000 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (414 citations). Danielle N. Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jesse Chandler, Pam Mueller, Abigail J. Stewart, Daniel G. Whitney, Seth Warschausky, Julie B. Kaplow, Itay Sisso, Morton L. Moss, Kathryn H. Howell and Mark D. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Journal of Chromatography A and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.