Danielle C. Blanch
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Family Practice top 5%
- Co-authors
- Judith A. HallDebra RoterRichard M. FrankelVictoria GallKaren H. CostenbaderMatthew H. LiangDeborah Ridley BromeElizabeth A. Wright
- Topics
- Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Family PracticeGeneral Health ProfessionsPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Journals
- Journal of General Internal MedicineJournal of Medical Internet ResearchPatient Education and Counseling
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Danielle C. Blanch
10 papers receiving 505 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- General Health Professions 201
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 199
- Psychiatry and Mental health 99
- Social Psychology 83
- Family Practice 81
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle C. Blanch
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle C. Blanch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle C. Blanch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle C. Blanch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle C. Blanch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle C. Blanch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle C. Blanch. The network helps show where Danielle C. Blanch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle C. Blanch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle C. Blanch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle C. Blanch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle C. Blanch. Danielle C. Blanch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 59 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 204 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | Effect of the internet on the doctor-patient relationship: A review of the literature | 3 |
About Danielle C. Blanch
Danielle C. Blanch is a scholar working on Family Practice, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (81 citations), General Health Professions (201 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (199 citations). Danielle C. Blanch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Judith A. Hall, Debra Roter, Richard M. Frankel, Victoria Gall, Karen H. Costenbader, Matthew H. Liang, Deborah Ridley Brome, Elizabeth A. Wright, Rima E. Rudd and Elizabeth W. Karlson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Patient Education and Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.