Michael Manocchia

1.6k citations
24 papers · 1.2k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Manocchia

23 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Michael Manocchia
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • General Health Professions 425
  • Pharmacology 123
  • Applied Psychology 58
  • Family Practice 21
  • Clinical Psychology 171
Replace David Newby with:
David Newby Australia
W. David Bradford United States
Amanda J. Abraham United States
Andrea Mant Australia
Robin Paynter United States
Alexander Hodkinson United Kingdom
Grant A. Ritter United States
Sinikka Sihvo Finland
Elisabeth Patiraki Greece
Jeffrey M. Rohay United States
Michael Manocchia relative to David Newby Australia David Newby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
David Newby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Manocchia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Manocchia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Manocchia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Manocchia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Manocchia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Manocchia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Manocchia. The network helps show where Michael Manocchia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Manocchia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Manocchia Line = papers co-authored together Michael Manocchia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003300
2 2001166
3 1995151
4 2015147
5 2003116
6 202139
7 201138
8 199432
9 200729
10 199724
11 199722
12 200622
13 199618
14 199715
15 200714
16 200513
17 20189
18 20196
19 20006
20 19955

About Michael Manocchia

Michael Manocchia is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers) and Sex and Gender in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (425 citations), Pharmacology (123 citations), Applied Psychology (58 citations), Family Practice (21 citations) and Clinical Psychology (171 citations). Michael Manocchia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John E. Ware, San Keller, Michael P. Massagli, Russell S. Phillips, Quyen Ngo‐Metzger, Brian Clarridge, Roger B. Davis, Lisa I. Iezzoni, Kenneth I. Kaitin and Louis Lasagna. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Drug Information Journal, American Journal of Medical Quality, Journal of Medical Internet Research and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact