Modern Language Quarterly

1.9k papers and 7.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Modern Language Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Modern Language Quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (572 papers), Sociology and Political Science (207 papers) and History (155 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (121 papers), Medieval Literature and History (110 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Language Quarterly are Robert F. Barsky, John Robert Moore, Marshall Brown, George Woodcock, Jeremy Tambling, Franco Moretti, Patricia Meyer Spacks, Harold Love, Carroll E. Reed and Hugh Witemeyer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Modern Language Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Language Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Language Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Modern Language Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Language Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Language Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Language Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025