Richard Strier

1.5k citations
37 papers · 284 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • History top 1%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

    • Medieval Literature and History 4
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 3
    • History of Medicine Studies 3

Richard Strier

25 papers receiving 133 citations

Peers

Richard Strier
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Classics 54
  • History 96
  • Literature and Literary Theory 91
  • Religious studies 29
  • Anthropology 36
Replace Debora Shuger with:
Debora Shuger United States
Arthur F. Marotti United States
Timothy Hampton United States
Daniel Javitch United States
Margaret L. King United States
Margaret Aston United Kingdom
Raymond B. Waddington United States
Neil Forsyth Switzerland
Martin Dzelzainis United Kingdom
Leah S. Marcus United States
Richard Strier relative to Debora Shuger United States Debora Shuger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Debora Shuger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Strier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Strier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Strier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Strier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Strier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Strier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Strier. The network helps show where Richard Strier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Richard Strier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Strier Line = papers co-authored together Richard Strier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20230
3 20220
4 20220
5
SHAKESPEARE AND THE SKEPTICS
20162
6 20130
7 20112
8 20061
9 20065
10 20051
11 20044
12 20002
13 199621
14 199616
15
The theatrical city : culture, theatre, and politics in London, 1576-1649
199522
16 19911
17 19898
18
Love Known: Theology and Experience in George Herbert's Poetry
198368
19 19796
20 19781

About Richard Strier

Richard Strier is a scholar working on Classics, History, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and Religious studies, having authored 37 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (3 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), History of Medicine Studies (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (54 citations), History (96 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (91 citations), Religious studies (29 citations) and Anthropology (36 citations). Richard Strier has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stanley Cavell, Heather Dubrow, David Bevington, David L. Smith, Paul Griffiths, Carla Mazzio, Donna B. Hamilton, Martha C. Nussbaum, Elizabeth Sauer and Joseph Wittreich. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Modern Philology, Literature Compass, The Journal of Religion and ELH.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026