Daniel J. Peterson

607 total citations
40 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

Daniel J. Peterson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel J. Peterson has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel J. Peterson's work include Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (11 papers) and Psychological and Educational Research Studies (5 papers). Daniel J. Peterson is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (11 papers) and Psychological and Educational Research Studies (5 papers). Daniel J. Peterson collaborates with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Daniel J. Peterson's co-authors include Neil W. Mulligan, Kathryn T. Wissman, Sara D. Davis, Jason Geller, Tommy Gärling, Martin Holmén, Amelie Gamble, Katherine A. Rawson, Craig H. Jones and John R. Slate and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Memory & Cognition and The American Journal of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel J. Peterson

35 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel J. Peterson United States 12 241 121 116 100 79 40 439
NarayanKripa Sundararajan United States 6 151 0.6× 203 1.7× 265 2.3× 179 1.8× 33 0.4× 9 515
Jeri L. Little United States 13 300 1.2× 167 1.4× 290 2.5× 123 1.2× 28 0.4× 23 586
Yunn-Wen Lien Taiwan 10 136 0.6× 53 0.4× 99 0.9× 132 1.3× 41 0.5× 15 328
Phillip J. Grimaldi United States 8 226 0.9× 119 1.0× 171 1.5× 126 1.3× 51 0.6× 14 507
Kayla Morehead United States 6 80 0.3× 162 1.3× 185 1.6× 125 1.3× 32 0.4× 9 329
William R. Balch United States 11 207 0.9× 108 0.9× 100 0.9× 106 1.1× 89 1.1× 28 392
Amber E. Witherby United States 10 227 0.9× 126 1.0× 193 1.7× 149 1.5× 55 0.7× 22 440
Elena Núñez Castellar Belgium 13 216 0.9× 68 0.6× 141 1.2× 67 0.7× 65 0.8× 15 497
Barbie J. Huelser United States 4 245 1.0× 127 1.0× 219 1.9× 138 1.4× 39 0.5× 4 438
Darren J. Yeo Singapore 10 213 0.9× 104 0.9× 135 1.2× 80 0.8× 20 0.3× 26 393

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Peterson. The network helps show where Daniel J. Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel J. Peterson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel J. Peterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel J. Peterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel J. Peterson. Daniel J. Peterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peterson, Daniel J., et al.. (2023). How does searching for faces among similar-looking distractors affect distractor memory?. Memory & Cognition. 51(6). 1404–1415. 2 indexed citations
2.
Davis, Sara D. & Daniel J. Peterson. (2022). Simulated viewing distance impairs the confidence–accuracy relationship for long, but not moderate distances: support for a model incorporating the role of feature ambiguity. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 7(1). 55–55. 3 indexed citations
3.
Peterson, Daniel J.. (2021). Tillich: A Brief Overview of the Life and Writings of Paul Tillich. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
4.
Geller, Jason & Daniel J. Peterson. (2021). Is this going to be on the test? Test expectancy moderates the disfluency effect with sans forgetica.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 47(12). 1924–1938. 8 indexed citations
5.
Geller, Jason, Sara D. Davis, & Daniel J. Peterson. (2020). Sans Forgetica is not desirable for learning. Memory. 28(8). 957–967. 14 indexed citations
6.
Mulligan, Neil W., Katherine A. Rawson, Daniel J. Peterson, & Kathryn T. Wissman. (2017). The replicability of the negative testing effect: Differences across participant populations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 44(5). 752–763. 6 indexed citations
7.
Peterson, Daniel J.. (2015). The Flipped Classroom Improves Student Achievement and Course Satisfaction in a Statistics Course. Teaching of Psychology. 43(1). 10–15. 108 indexed citations
8.
Peterson, Daniel J.. (2015). Prospects for a new account of time reversal. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 49. 42–56. 11 indexed citations
9.
Mulligan, Neil W. & Daniel J. Peterson. (2014). The negative testing and negative generation effects are eliminated by delay.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 41(4). 1014–1025. 12 indexed citations
10.
Mulligan, Neil W. & Daniel J. Peterson. (2014). Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 41(3). 859–871. 34 indexed citations
11.
Mulligan, Neil W. & Daniel J. Peterson. (2013). The spacing effect and metacognitive control.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 40(1). 306–311. 5 indexed citations
12.
Peterson, Daniel J. & Neil W. Mulligan. (2013). The negative testing effect and multifactor account.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(4). 1287–1293. 44 indexed citations
13.
Peterson, Daniel J.. (2013). The Kenosis of the Father: Affirming God's Action at the Higher Levels of Nature. Theology and Science. 11(4). 451–454.
14.
Mulligan, Neil W. & Daniel J. Peterson. (2013). The negative repetition effect.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(5). 1403–1416. 16 indexed citations
15.
Peterson, Daniel J. & Neil W. Mulligan. (2012). A negative effect of repetition in episodic memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(6). 1786–1791. 6 indexed citations
16.
Mulligan, Neil W., et al.. (2010). Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: The modality-match effect in recognition memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 36(2). 558–566. 20 indexed citations
17.
Peterson, Daniel J. & Neil W. Mulligan. (2010). Enactment and retrieval. Memory & Cognition. 38(2). 233–243. 23 indexed citations
18.
Mulligan, Neil W. & Daniel J. Peterson. (2008). Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 34(3). 662–679. 25 indexed citations
19.
Peterson, Daniel J.. (2005). Speaking of God after the Death of God. Dialog. 44(3). 207–226. 1 indexed citations
20.
Peterson, Daniel J., et al.. (1974). The concurrent validity of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test.. PubMed. 70(4). 221–3. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by NarayanKripa Sundararajan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeri L. Little Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yunn-Wen Lien Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Phillip J. Grimaldi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kayla Morehead Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William R. Balch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amber E. Witherby Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elena Núñez Castellar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Barbie J. Huelser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Darren J. Yeo
Rankless by CCL
2026