Daniel E. White
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology
- Education
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Seamus DelaneyR. M. CookGerald P. Schaus
- Topics
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (3 papers)Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers)Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Daniel E. White
25 papers receiving 88 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Literature and Literary Theory 27
- Sociology and Political Science 21
- Anthropology 18
- Education 18
- Political Science and International Relations 16
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. White
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. White more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. White
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. White. The network helps show where Daniel E. White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel E. White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel E. White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel E. White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel E. White. Daniel E. White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | Mentoring the Consultancy Project: Lessons in Collaboration and Research. | 1 |
| 4 | Notes Toward an Affective Anthropology of International Relations | 1 |
| 5 | Middle-earth music: The sonic inhabitation of a fantasy world | 1 |
| 6 | Nietzsche at the Mall: Deconstructing the Consumer | 1 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Improving Administrative Internship Programs: Perceptions of Illinois Principals. | 1 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Repairing Damaged Work Relationships in R&D | 0 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Teacher concerns and perceptions related to the use of technology | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | The Extramural Sanctuary of Demeter and Persephone at Cyrene, Libya: Final Reports2. The East Greek, Island and Laconian Pottery | 5 |
About Daniel E. White
Daniel E. White is a scholar working on General Energy, Literature and Literary Theory and Philosophy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (27 citations), Anthropology (18 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (2 citations). Daniel E. White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Seamus Delaney, R. M. Cook and Gerald P. Schaus. Their work appears in journals such as Research-Technology Management, Eighteenth-Century Studies and Studies in Romanticism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.