Matthew Rubery

440 citations
20 papers · 114 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Digital Humanities and Scholarship 4
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 3
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 2
    • Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 2
    • Media Studies and Communication 3
    • Media, Communication, and Education 3

Matthew Rubery

14 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

Matthew Rubery
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Communication 32
  • Literature and Literary Theory 48
  • History 21
  • Music 6
  • Cultural Studies 11
Replace Dziga Vertov with:
Dziga Vertov
Paul Baines United States
Ellen Gruber Garvey United States
Jeremy G. Butler United States
Nora M. Alter United States
Roger Odin France
Faye Hammill United Kingdom
David Robey United Kingdom
Siegfried Zielinski Germany
Audrey A. Fisch United States
Matthew Rubery relative to Dziga Vertov Dziga Vertov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dziga Vertov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Rubery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Rubery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Rubery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Rubery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Rubery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Rubery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Rubery. The network helps show where Matthew Rubery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Rubery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Rubery Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Rubery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201635
2 200934
3 200810
4 20144
5 20114
6 20044
7 20103
8 20093
9 20223
10 20133
11 20203
12 20083
13 20072
14 20081
15
Secret Commissions : An Anthology of Victorian Investigative Journalism
20121
16 20081
17 20060
18 20180
19 20130
20 20200

About Matthew Rubery

Matthew Rubery is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Communication, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 114 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (4 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (3 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers) and Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (48 citations), History (21 citations), Music (6 citations) and Cultural Studies (11 citations). Matthew Rubery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Cannon and Stephen K. Donovan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Victorian Culture, ˜The œHenry James review, Nineteenth-Century Literature, Literature Compass and Media History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact