Daniel Crowther
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
-
- CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Community Health and Development 1
- Co-authors
- Markus Loeffler (1 shared paper)Peter A. Cassileth (1 shared paper)P Jacobs (1 shared paper)M. Sextro (1 shared paper)Volker Diehl (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Thompson (1 shared paper)Dirk Hasenclever (1 shared paper)S Pavlovsky (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)International Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (1 paper)Journal of Translational Medicine (1 paper)BMC Health Services Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Crowther
13 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 152
- Neurology 65
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 128
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 56
- Small Animals 19
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Crowther
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Crowther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Crowther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Crowther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Crowther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Crowther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Crowther. The network helps show where Daniel Crowther may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Crowther, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 143 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 72 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 67 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 3 |
About Daniel Crowther
Daniel Crowther is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper), Community Health and Development (1 paper), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (152 citations), Neurology (65 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (128 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (56 citations) and Small Animals (19 citations). Daniel Crowther has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Markus Loeffler, Peter A. Cassileth, P Jacobs, M. Sextro, Volker Diehl, Elizabeth Thompson, Dirk Hasenclever, S Pavlovsky, David Assouline and Oana Brosteanu. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, International Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Journal of Translational Medicine and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.