Dan Mitchell

434 total citations
11 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Dan Mitchell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dan Mitchell has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Applied Psychology and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dan Mitchell's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). Dan Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). Dan Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Dan Mitchell's co-authors include Lawrence Murphy, Robert J. MacFadden, Craig Jordan, Mark Claypool, Kathi Fisler, Rebecca H. Hallett and Kate Collie and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, Journal of Technology in Human Services and Studies in health technology and informatics.

In The Last Decade

Dan Mitchell

11 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dan Mitchell Canada	7	193	157	123	76	49	11	336
Kate Anthony Ireland	9	122 0.6×	92 0.6×	71 0.6×	81 1.1×	42 0.9×	15	240
Cedric Speyer Portugal	2	194 1.0×	136 0.9×	105 0.9×	107 1.4×	48 1.0×	3	305
Mitchell Dowling Australia	10	190 1.0×	108 0.7×	147 1.2×	131 1.7×	29 0.6×	12	344
Stefanie S. Boswell United States	8	42 0.2×	57 0.4×	131 1.1×	58 0.8×	28 0.6×	16	309
James S. Korcuska United States	8	53 0.3×	50 0.3×	129 1.0×	101 1.3×	14 0.3×	14	325
Samuel D. Lustgarten United States	6	98 0.5×	141 0.9×	40 0.3×	96 1.3×	46 0.9×	8	307
Jennifer Teramoto Pedrotti United States	9	25 0.1×	65 0.4×	91 0.7×	85 1.1×	13 0.3×	15	234
Edward S. Neukrug United States	12	29 0.2×	84 0.5×	206 1.7×	186 2.4×	11 0.2×	31	404
Patricia A. Connor‐Greene United States	12	37 0.2×	46 0.3×	68 0.6×	120 1.6×	56 1.1×	20	479
Ana Rodríguez‐Meirinhos Spain	8	50 0.3×	108 0.7×	141 1.1×	163 2.1×	21 0.4×	15	344

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Mitchell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Mitchell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Mitchell. The network helps show where Dan Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Mitchell. Dan Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Jordan, Craig, et al.. (2011). CounterMeasures: a game for teaching computer security. 1–6. 10 indexed citations

2.

Jordan, Craig, et al.. (2011). CounterMeasures: A game for teaching computer security. 1–6. 22 indexed citations

3.

Murphy, Lawrence, Dan Mitchell, & Rebecca H. Hallett. (2011). A Comparison of Client Characteristics in Cyber and In-Person Counseling. Studies in health technology and informatics. 167. 149–53. 7 indexed citations

4.

Murphy, Lawrence & Dan Mitchell. (2009). Overcoming the Absence of Tone and Non-Verbal Elements of Communication in Text-Based Cybercounselling. Studies in health technology and informatics. 143. 215–9. 4 indexed citations

5.

Murphy, Lawrence, Robert J. MacFadden, & Dan Mitchell. (2008). Cybercounseling Online: The Development of a University-Based Training Program for E-mail Counseling. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 26(2-4). 447–469. 34 indexed citations

6.

Mitchell, Dan & Lawrence Murphy. (2003). E-mail Rules! Organizations and Individuals Creating Ethical Excellence in Telemental-Health.. 6 indexed citations

7.

Collie, Kate, Dan Mitchell, & Lawrence Murphy. (2001). E-mail Counseling: Skills for Maximum Impact. 4 indexed citations

8.

Mitchell, Dan, et al.. (2000). Skills for On-Line Counseling: Maximum Impact at Minimum Bandwidth.. 14 indexed citations

9.

Murphy, Lawrence & Dan Mitchell. (1998). When writing helps to heal: e-mail as therapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 26(1). 21–32. 123 indexed citations

10.

Murphy, Lawrence & Dan Mitchell. (1998). When writing helps to heal: E-mail as therapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 26(1). 21–32. 108 indexed citations

11.

Mitchell, Dan. (1993). When the Values of Clients and Counsellors Clash:Some Conceptual and Ethical Propositions. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 27(3). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact