Mitchell Dowling
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 8
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 4
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression 1
- Co-authors
- Debra Rickwood (5 shared papers)Timothy A. Carey (1 shared paper)Tracey A Davenport (5 shared papers)Ian B. Hickie (5 shared papers)Alyssa Milton (4 shared papers)Catherine Hungerford (1 shared paper)Ashlea Hambleton (1 shared paper)Jane Burns (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- JMIR Mental Health (2 papers)Journal of Gambling Studies (1 paper)Psychology in the Schools (1 paper)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Mitchell Dowling
12 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Applied Psychology 190
- Social Psychology 147
- Clinical Psychology 131
- General Health Professions 70
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Dowling
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Dowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Dowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Dowling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Dowling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Dowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Dowling. The network helps show where Mitchell Dowling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Dowling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 124 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 2 |
About Mitchell Dowling
Mitchell Dowling is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (190 citations), Social Psychology (147 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations), General Health Professions (70 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (33 citations). Mitchell Dowling has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Debra Rickwood, Timothy A. Carey, Tracey A Davenport, Ian B. Hickie, Alyssa Milton, Catherine Hungerford, Ashlea Hambleton, Jane Burns, Anna Roberts and Samuel J Hockey. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR Mental Health, Journal of Gambling Studies, Psychology in the Schools, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Computers in Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.