Dagmara Annaz

19 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Dagmara Annaz
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 688
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 512
  • Developmental Neuroscience 395
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 263
  • Clinical Psychology 227
Replace Kate Humphreys with:
Kate Humphreys United States
Sarah Grice United Kingdom
Yonata Levy Israel
Silvia Lanfranchi Italy
Susan Faja United States
Hanife Halit United Kingdom
Margaret Kjelgaard United States
Bronwyn Glaser Switzerland
Linda J. Hesketh United States
Andréia Santos France
Dagmara Annaz relative to Kate Humphreys United States Kate Humphreys's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Kate Humphreys · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dagmara Annaz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dagmara Annaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dagmara Annaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dagmara Annaz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dagmara Annaz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dagmara Annaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dagmara Annaz. The network helps show where Dagmara Annaz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dagmara Annaz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dagmara Annaz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dagmara Annaz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dagmara Annaz. Dagmara Annaz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 94
3 21
4 98
5 21
6 35
7 61
8 4
9 119
10 69
11 5
12 49
13 127
14 107
15 349
16
Using developmental trajectories to understand genetic disorders.
18
17 84
18
A visual conflict hypothesis for global-local visual deficits in Williams Syndrome: simulations and data
2
19 192

About Dagmara Annaz

Dagmara Annaz is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Williams Syndrome Research (11 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (395 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (512 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (688 citations). Dagmara Annaz has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Annette Karmiloff‐Smith, Michael S. C. Thomas, Gabriella Rundblad, Christopher Jarrold, Gaia Scerif, Daniel Ansari, Ruth Campbell, Catherine M. Hill, E S McCaughey and Mark H. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026