Cynthia D. Belar
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- General Psychology top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nathan W. PerryWilliam W. DeardorffGary R. VandenBosPatrick H. DeLeonRonald H. RozenskyEdward P. SheridanDavid S. HargroveCarolyn S. Schroeder
- Topics
- Counseling Practices and Supervision (22 papers)Health Sciences Research and Education (7 papers)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Cynthia D. Belar
71 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Social Psychology 629
- Clinical Psychology 445
- General Health Professions 358
- General Psychology 261
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 220
Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia D. Belar
This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia D. Belar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia D. Belar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia D. Belar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cynthia D. Belar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia D. Belar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia D. Belar. The network helps show where Cynthia D. Belar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cynthia D. Belar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cynthia D. Belar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cynthia D. Belar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cynthia D. Belar. Cynthia D. Belar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Unified Code of Ethics for Health Professionals | 1 |
| 2 | 58 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 73 | |
| 12 | Sociocultural and individual differences | 6 |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | Health psychology : a discipline and a profession | 49 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Cynthia D. Belar
Cynthia D. Belar is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology and Occupational Therapy, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (22 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (7 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (261 citations), Social Psychology (629 citations) and Clinical Psychology (445 citations). Cynthia D. Belar has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nathan W. Perry, William W. Deardorff, Gary R. VandenBos, Patrick H. DeLeon, Ronald H. Rozensky, Edward P. Sheridan, David S. Hargrove, Carolyn S. Schroeder, Susan H. McDaniel and Ronald T. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, American Psychologist and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.