Caren Jordan
About
In The Last Decade
Caren Jordan
6 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Reproductive Medicine 215
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 165
- Demography 118
- Social Psychology 56
- Clinical Psychology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Caren Jordan
This map shows the geographic impact of Caren Jordan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caren Jordan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caren Jordan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caren Jordan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caren Jordan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caren Jordan. The network helps show where Caren Jordan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caren Jordan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caren Jordan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caren Jordan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caren Jordan. Caren Jordan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | Training residents in problem-solving treatment of depression: a pilot feasibility and impact study. | 57 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 202 | |
| 6 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.