William W. Deardorff
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Cynthia D. BelarDavid W. ScottRobert J. GatchelRichard D. GuyerAndrew R. BlockH. Richard BarthelKaren E. KellyLawrence S. Miller
- Topics
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers)Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
William W. Deardorff
14 papers receiving 361 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Pharmacology 186
- Clinical Psychology 94
- Psychiatry and Mental health 79
- General Health Professions 73
- Social Psychology 63
Countries citing papers authored by William W. Deardorff
This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Deardorff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Deardorff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Deardorff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Deardorff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Deardorff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Deardorff. The network helps show where William W. Deardorff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William W. Deardorff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William W. Deardorff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William W. Deardorff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William W. Deardorff. William W. Deardorff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 70 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | Clinical health psychology in medical settings a practitioner's guidebook | 54 |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 81 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | The practice of clinical health psychology | 11 |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 7 |
About William W. Deardorff
William W. Deardorff is a scholar working on Anatomy, Complementary and Manual Therapy and Pharmacology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (26 citations), Pharmacology (186 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (44 citations). William W. Deardorff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia D. Belar, David W. Scott, Robert J. Gatchel, Richard D. Guyer, Andrew R. Block, H. Richard Barthel, Karen E. Kelly, Lawrence S. Miller and Herbert J. Cross. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Cognitive Therapy and Research and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.