Craig Marsh

537 citations
9 papers · 284 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Craig Marsh

7 papers receiving 256 citations

Craig Marsh's Hit Papers

Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature 2017 · 254 citations
2540+3+6Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Craig Marsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Computer Science Applications 51
  • Education 170
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 45
  • Information Systems 71
Replace Lisa Emerson with:
Lisa Emerson New Zealand
Yu-mei Wang United States
Donna Fernández Nogueira Spain
Ana Otto Spain
Magda Pischetola Brazil
Thomas de Lange Norway
Christian Labbé Chile
Lilia Raitskaya Russia
Malissa Maria Mahmud Malaysia
Wanjira Kinuthia United States
Craig Marsh relative to Lisa Emerson New Zealand Lisa Emerson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Lisa Emerson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Marsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Marsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Marsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Marsh. The network helps show where Craig Marsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Craig Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig Marsh Line = papers co-authored together Craig Marsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature
Hit paper breakdown →
2017254
2 201618
3 20105
4 20154
5 20101
6 20101
7 20021
8 20250
9 20250

About Craig Marsh

Craig Marsh is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper), Economic Policies and Impacts (1 paper), Innovative Teaching Methods (1 paper) and Securities Regulation and Market Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (51 citations), Education (170 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (45 citations) and Information Systems (71 citations). Craig Marsh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gary J Burkholder, Laura A. Schindler, Alistair Dunn, Ian J. Doonan, Sophie Mormede, Paul Sparrow, R. Woolley, Nokuthaba Sibanda, Anthony Hesketh and Curry J. Cunningham. Their work appears in journals such as Fish and Fisheries, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Fisheries Research, Procedia Environmental Sciences and Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact