Constance Dean Qualls

1.1k citations
17 papers · 588 indexed · h-index 13

Constance Dean Qualls

17 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Constance Dean Qualls
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 292
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 170
  • Clinical Psychology 269
  • Occupational Therapy 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 130
Replace Amy L. Weiss with:
Amy L. Weiss United States
Dixie Sanger United States
Chantal Desmarais Canada
Eileen Cini Australia
Anthony DiLollo United States
Yvette D. Hyter United States
Mavis Donahue United States
Carole Kaplan United Kingdom
Sarah Verdon Australia
Evelien Dirks Netherlands
Constance Dean Qualls relative to Amy L. Weiss United States Amy L. Weiss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Amy L. Weiss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance Dean Qualls

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Dean Qualls's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Dean Qualls with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Dean Qualls more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Dean Qualls

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Dean Qualls. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Dean Qualls. The network helps show where Constance Dean Qualls may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Constance Dean Qualls, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance Dean Qualls Line = papers co-authored together Constance Dean Qualls links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201359
2 200811
3 200681
4 20054
5 20051
6 200421
7 200378
8 2003101
9 200315
10 200337
11 200333
12 20022
13
Recruitment of African American adults as research participants for a language in aging study: example of a principled, creative, and culture-based approach.
200219
14 200266
15 200218
16 199917
17 199825

About Constance Dean Qualls

Constance Dean Qualls is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers), Language Development and Disorders (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (3 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (292 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (170 citations) and Clinical Psychology (269 citations). Constance Dean Qualls has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gordon W. Blood, Carol Scheffner Hammer, Joyce L. Harris, Ingrid M. Blood, Tobi Frymark, Tracy Schooling, Wendy A. Rogers, Tammy Hopper and Michelle S. Bourgeois. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026