Çiğdem Topçu

719 total citations
9 papers, 516 citations indexed

About

Çiğdem Topçu is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Education and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Çiğdem Topçu has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 516 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Social Psychology, 7 papers in Education and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Çiğdem Topçu's work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (8 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers). Çiğdem Topçu is often cited by papers focused on Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (8 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers). Çiğdem Topçu collaborates with scholars based in Türkiye and Italy. Çiğdem Topçu's co-authors include Özgür Erdur‐Baker, Yeşim Çapa Aydın, Ali Yıldırım and İbrahim Tanrıkulu and has published in prestigious journals such as School Psychology International, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development and International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling.

In The Last Decade

Çiğdem Topçu

9 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Çiğdem Topçu Türkiye	8	453	297	198	147	73	9	516
Jan Pfetsch Germany	11	429 0.9×	318 1.1×	200 1.0×	146 1.0×	62 0.8×	38	565
Catarina Katzer Germany	6	464 1.0×	309 1.0×	191 1.0×	151 1.0×	53 0.7×	7	510
Piotr Plichta Poland	6	376 0.8×	260 0.9×	134 0.7×	104 0.7×	86 1.2×	20	520
Sofia Berne Sweden	8	501 1.1×	298 1.0×	212 1.1×	177 1.2×	107 1.5×	16	616
Nafsika Antoniadou Greece	12	567 1.3×	308 1.0×	281 1.4×	165 1.1×	136 1.9×	21	658
Chantal Faucher Canada	9	444 1.0×	198 0.7×	250 1.3×	179 1.2×	50 0.7×	9	548
Alena Černá Czechia	9	510 1.1×	297 1.0×	270 1.4×	187 1.3×	82 1.1×	12	609
Anna Szuster Poland	8	372 0.8×	146 0.5×	172 0.9×	163 1.1×	60 0.8×	22	465
İbrahim Tanrıkulu Türkiye	9	279 0.6×	170 0.6×	111 0.6×	90 0.6×	94 1.3×	18	365
Dianne L. Hoff United States	6	280 0.6×	221 0.7×	141 0.7×	114 0.8×	32 0.4×	12	387

Countries citing papers authored by Çiğdem Topçu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Çiğdem Topçu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Çiğdem Topçu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Çiğdem Topçu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Çiğdem Topçu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Çiğdem Topçu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Çiğdem Topçu. The network helps show where Çiğdem Topçu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Çiğdem Topçu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Çiğdem Topçu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Çiğdem Topçu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Çiğdem Topçu. Çiğdem Topçu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Topçu, Çiğdem & Özgür Erdur‐Baker. (2017). RCBI-II: The Second Revision of the Revised Cyber Bullying Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 51(1). 32–41. 44 indexed citations

Erdur‐Baker, Özgür, İbrahim Tanrıkulu, & Çiğdem Topçu. (2016). Gender Differences İn Cyberbullying Perpetration:The Role Of Moral Disengagement And Aggression.. OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University). 3 indexed citations

Topçu, Çiğdem & Özgür Erdur‐Baker. (2016). Zorbalık Mağdurlarının Yardım Alma Davranışı ve Yardım Kaynakları. Ege Eğitim Dergisi. 17(1). 127–127. 8 indexed citations

Topçu, Çiğdem & Özgür Erdur‐Baker. (2012). Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychology International. 33(5). 550–561. 127 indexed citations

Topçu, Çiğdem, Ali Yıldırım, & Özgür Erdur‐Baker. (2012). Cyber Bullying @ Schools: What do Turkish Adolescents Think?. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling. 35(2). 139–151. 20 indexed citations

Topçu, Çiğdem, et al.. (2011). An international study of cyber bullying perception and diffusion among adolescents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 15. 3805–3809. 13 indexed citations

Topçu, Çiğdem, Özgür Erdur‐Baker, & Yeşim Çapa Aydın. (2010). Temel Empati Ölçeği Türkçe Uyarlaması:Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 4(34). 174–180. 9 indexed citations

Topçu, Çiğdem & Özgür Erdur‐Baker. (2010). The Revised Cyber Bullying Inventory (RCBI): validity and reliability studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 5. 660–664. 118 indexed citations

Topçu, Çiğdem, Özgür Erdur‐Baker, & Yeşim Çapa Aydın. (2008). Examination of Cyberbullying Experiences among Turkish Students from Different School Types. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 11(6). 643–648. 174 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact