Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators
- Authors
- Yalin SunYan ZhangJacek GwizdkaCiaran B. Trace
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2196/12522 →Countries where authors are citing Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators
This map shows the geographic impact of Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators
This network shows the impact of Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators.
About Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators
This paper, published in 2019, received 200 indexed citations . Written by Yalin Sun, Yan Zhang, Jacek Gwizdka and Ciaran B. Trace covering the research area of General Health Professions and Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (128 citations), Health (77 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (72 citations). Published in Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/12522.