Christopher Meyers

781 citations
44 papers · 398 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Meyers

42 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Christopher Meyers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Communication 82
  • Information Systems and Management 44
  • Philosophy 51
  • Pharmacy 18
  • General Health Professions 89
Replace Elizabeth A. Boyd with:
Elizabeth A. Boyd United States
James K. Hertog United States
Simone C. O. Conceição United States
Daniel Hunt United Kingdom
Taejin Jung United States
Danielle Allard Canada
Petya Eckler United States
Katharina Wolf Australia
Anna Jones United Kingdom
Dan O’Hair United States
Christopher Meyers relative to Elizabeth A. Boyd United States Elizabeth A. Boyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Elizabeth A. Boyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Meyers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Meyers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Meyers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Meyers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Meyers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Meyers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Meyers. The network helps show where Christopher Meyers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Meyers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Meyers Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Meyers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Dissident Knowledge in Higher Education
201872
2 199643
3 200436
4 201022
5 201221
6 199315
7 200714
8 200014
9 200313
10 200711
11 202010
12 200910
13 20119
14 20219
15 20048
16 19997
17 20167
18 20136
19 19906
20 20135

About Christopher Meyers

Christopher Meyers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Philosophy, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 44 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (16 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (82 citations), Information Systems and Management (44 citations), Philosophy (51 citations), Pharmacy (18 citations) and General Health Professions (89 citations). Christopher Meyers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Edward Wasserman, Sandra L. Borden, Norman K. Denzin, Marie Battiste, Patti Lather, Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Budd L. Hall, Rosalind Gill, Peter McLaren and Eve Tuck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, The Hastings Center Report, Journal of Social Philosophy, The Journal of Clinical Ethics and Journal of Media Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact